Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] mklibs.py integration

2009-08-07 Thread Felix Fietkau
Hi all, I reworked and fixed the mklibs.py integration and it actually works now. The reported 4KB space saving in the linker binary that florian reported was just simple stripping, not actual relinking. Here are the results with a slightly-bigger-than-standard configuration on a mips target: lib

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] mklibs.py integration

2009-08-01 Thread Daniel Dickinson
On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 05:03:22 -0400 Daniel Dickinson wrote: > > Doesn't mklibs.py remove portions of a library that are unused? > Wouldn't that mean that fewer programs would result in more removal > (due to more unused bits). Or do you strip all libraries and not > just uClibc? > Never mind.

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] mklibs.py integration

2009-08-01 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hi Daniel, Le Saturday 01 August 2009 11:03:22 Daniel Dickinson, vous avez écrit : > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:25:20 +0200 > > Florian Fainelli wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Please find below a proof-of-concept of the mklibs.py reduction > > integration in OpenWrt. I have not been able to strip the uCl

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [RFC] mklibs.py integration

2009-08-01 Thread Daniel Dickinson
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 12:25:20 +0200 Florian Fainelli wrote: > Hi all, > > Please find below a proof-of-concept of the mklibs.py reduction > integration in OpenWrt. I have not been able to strip the uClibc > loader more than 4KB out of 28KB (original size) but it might > significantly better resul