Re: [Operators] Spam Problem And Its Simple Solution

On 2 December 2016 at 10:04, Tomasz Sterna wrote: > W dniu 19.11.2016, sob o godzinie 15∶19 +0300, użytkownik A napisał: >> Very easy. Popular clients just incorporated simple anti-spam >> measures to perform human-testing for any new senders. > There also is an IM2000 proposal

Re: [Operators] Spam Problem And Its Simple Solution

W dniu 02.12.2016, pią o godzinie 11∶11 +0100, użytkownik Florian Schmaus napisał: > > Interestingly it already has an XMPP based implementation. > Where is that implementation? Last seen at  https://web.archive.org/web/20050403182046/http://ngmp.libretech.org/ -- /o__ (_<^' How do you

Re: [Operators] Spam Problem And Its Simple Solution

W dniu 02.12.2016, pią o godzinie 11∶08 +, użytkownik Matthew Wild napisał: > > There also is an IM2000 proposal [1] > I don't see how this is any better than rate limits on the sending > side. It's not like a spammer will need to store 1000 copies of > the same message to send it to

Re: [Operators] Spam Problem And Its Simple Solution

On 02.12.2016 11:04, Tomasz Sterna wrote: > Interestingly it already has an XMPP based implementation. Where is that implementation? - Florian signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [Operators] Spam Problem And Its Simple Solution

Hello, > On 19 Nov 2016, at 21:00, A wrote: > > Hello, Mickaël. Will this reputation system work for disposable accounts, > automatically created and used to send just one SPAM/SPIM message? Yes, I think so. If we consider your account reputation increase with age. We can

Re: [Operators] Spam Problem And Its Simple Solution

W dniu 19.11.2016, sob o godzinie 15∶19 +0300, użytkownik A napisał: > Very easy. Popular clients just incorporated simple anti-spam > measures to perform human-testing for any new senders. Any solution that puts the burden of fighting SMAP on the users and keeps the SPAM sending cost at zero is