[Operators] public XMPP service: [jabber.cz]

: [14.51] * CA: [CAcert] * server software: [ejabberd] * admin name: [Jan Pinkas] * admin JID: [pi...@njs.netlab.cz] * description: [Jabber.cz] -- S pozdravem, Jan Pinkas HumboldTec spol. s r.o. Schwarzova 5 320 14 Plzen T +420 377 478 592 F +420 377 478 595

[Operators] public XMPP service: [jabbim.cz]

: [14.51] * CA: [CAcert] * server software: [ejabberd] * admin name: [Jan Pinkas] * admin JID: [pi...@njs.netlab.cz] * description: [Jabbim.cz] -- S pozdravem, Jan Pinkas HumboldTec spol. s r.o. Schwarzova 5 320 14 Plzen T +420 377 478 592 F +420 377 478 595

[Operators] public XMPP service: [njs.netlab.cz]

: [14.51] * CA: [CAcert] * server software: [ejabberd] * admin name: [Jan Pinkas] * admin JID: [pi...@njs.netlab.cz] * description: [Netlab Jabber Server] -- S pozdravem, Jan Pinkas HumboldTec spol. s r.o. Schwarzova 5 320 14 Plzen T +420 377 478 592 F +420

[Operators] public XMPP service: [jabbim.com]

: [14.51] * CA: [CAcert] * server software: [ejabberd] * admin name: [Jan Pinkas] * admin JID: [pi...@njs.netlab.cz] * description: [Jabbim for EN users] -- S pozdravem, Jan Pinkas HumboldTec spol. s r.o. Schwarzova 5 320 14 Plzen T +420 377 478 592 F +420 377

Re: [Operators] in-band registration (was: Re: Potential distributed attack)

Yes Kevin, it's true, but we have XEP with Captcha years old but many clients don't support this feature. For example Miranda IM. And Psi maybe too. Dne 10. dubna 2012 23:22 Kevin Smith ke...@kismith.co.uk napsal(a): On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Peter Saint-Andre stpe...@stpeter.im wrote:

Re: [Operators] Potential distributed attack

In-band registration without captcha is big security risk. And not only for you, but for whole network. Close your in-band registration, your server is dangerous for our federation. Thanks. Jan pinky Pinkas Dne 10. dubna 2012 23:03 Claudiu Curcă clau...@coderollers.com napsal(a): Hello,

Re: [Operators] World IPv6 Launch

We have ipv6.jabbim.cz hostname for IPv6 connections. It's not good idea IPv6 SRV record in DNS zone, IPv6 connections and routing have problems now. Most of IPv6 users have only low quality IPv6 tunnel. 2012/5/28 Jan Pinkas pin...@htec.cz: We have ipv6.jabbim.cz hostname for IPv6 connections

Re: [Operators] Whitelist for third party XMPP servers to invite gmail.com accounts

Hi, this solution killed using transports (from external servers) for Google Apps / Google Talk users. RIE from transports is dead too. Best regards, Pinky from Jabbim.com 2013/3/1 Sebastián Odena sebod...@gmail.com I am unable to send chat invites from my xmpp server to gmail.comaccounts. I

Re: [Operators] buycc.me spam domain

Hi all. Solution for ejabberd: nano /etc/hosts add 127.0.0.5 buycc.me save and ejabberdctl debug, mnesia:clear_table(s2s), ctrl-c, ctrl-c. Have a nice day. pinky 2015-05-13 15:08 GMT+02:00 Peter Saint-Andre - yet pe...@andyet.net: As far as I can determine, buycc.me is a spam domain, sending

Re: [Operators] Source of the JIDs being spammed? -- Re: Suspicion of Jabbim services being hacked

idea, but break the current > protocol. > > casper // systemli.org > > On 30.12.2015 22:19, Jan Pinkas wrote: > > Hi Kim, > > its not look like we are only one source of data... From Jabbim leaked > > users table from ejabberd database... Not rosters of our users.

Re: [Operators] Source of the JIDs being spammed? -- Re: Suspicion of Jabbim services being hacked

Hi Kim, its not look like we are only one source of data... From Jabbim leaked users table from ejabberd database... Not rosters of our users. And spam was received too to newest accounts and my testing accounts. 1. Maybe more servers was hacked (and hack was not reported) 2. Some web pages

Re: [Operators] Using XMPP server behind proxy / NAT

2017-04-26 15:15 GMT+02:00 Thomas Leister : > Hi operators! > > Is there any kind of technology which lets my Prosody XMPP server or any > other XMPP server receive a client's IP address even behind a NAT or a > HAProxy? We do have Proxy Headers for HTTP, but is there

Re: [Operators] Announce: Jabber Spam Fighting Manifesto (for public servers)

Hello, from my perspective, manifesto is good idea, but too idealistic :-). Manifesto don't stop anything. Spammers are bad guys. This guys don't read manifestos. We need technical solutions: 1. Default behavior: don't accept messages from contacts without subscription. This is default for other

Re: [Operators] Announce: Jabber Spam Fighting Manifesto (for public servers)

2:27:50PM +0100, Jan Pinkas wrote: > > We need technical solutions: > > 1. Default behavior: don't accept messages from contacts without > > subscription. This is default for other IM systems. > > This is not the default for the most popular IM system: SMS. > > Plea