27. feb. 2014 kl. 08:37 skrev Joakim Hove :
>The reason for this is compatibility with MRST, which has the same
> convention.
>
> Time to cut that umbilical?
I think no, for at least two reasons.
1. By this time, the convention is used throughout a lot of code, and
abandoning it woul
The reason for this is compatibility with MRST, which has the same
convention.
Time to cut that umbilical?
Joakim
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is intended
for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the information
or copying of t
Hi Markus!
Your observation is correct. The normals in the UnstructuredGrid are required
to have length equal to the
area of the corresponding face (see the Doxygen doc for UnstructuredGrid).
The reason for this is compatibility with MRST, which has the same convention.
In particular some of th
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 10:05:05PM +0100, Markus Blatt wrote:
> In UnstructuredGrid the face_normals are normalized. In contrast they
> dp not seem to be normalized in CpGrid.
It is the other way around: the face normals of Cpgrid is normalized
and the one of UG is not.
>
> I have two questions:
Hi,
there seems to be a slight incompatibility between CpGrid and
UnstructuredGrid which has not so slight consequences:
In UnstructuredGrid the face_normals are normalized. In contrast they
dp not seem to be normalized in CpGrid.
I have two questions:
1. Is this difference needed?
2. What lengt
