Adding the link for the updates of HA API docs. Please review the patch before
the meeting so that we can have an efficient discussion.
https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/26663/
-邮件原件-
发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org
[mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org]
You can reference the info collected on the Models wiki:
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/models/References, and on the Functest wiki at
https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/functest/List+Of+VNFs
As part of the objective of the Models project, we are building a list of VNFs
that meet the following
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 15.0 MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:REQUEST
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
Hi, all. Below are the logistic for this week's project meeting. According to
Yuan Yue's suggestion, we will try zoom this time. Please check out the
following link before head and see if you need to download the zoom software.
Hope this will work out fine.
Agenda:
1, yardstick's current work
Aaron,
OK, I added that topic in today’s agenda for Doctor meeting.
Talk to you soon,
Ryota
From: Aaron Smith [mailto:aasm...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 12:06 AM
To: Mibu Ryota(壬生 亮太)
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re:
Hi Yardstick team,
Sorry I was late for today's working meeting.
Yujun send an email to answer Yardstick's questions about this integration[1].
Maybe some committers and contributors missed this email.
Hope we can reach a final decision in the end of this week.
Thanks!
[1]
BEGIN:VCALENDAR
METHOD:REQUEST
PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010
VERSION:2.0
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:China Standard Time
BEGIN:STANDARD
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
DTSTART:16010101T00
TZOFFSETFROM:+0800
TZOFFSETTO:+0800
END:DAYLIGHT
Team,
There seems to be some misunderstanding about the Danube release status.
I've had people email me with comments about continuing to integrate with
other scenarios or installers, or enabling additional features, etc.
To be clear, we are past Milestone 5, which means that features are frozen
Hi Ryota,
I think this is a good plan. We can start the discussion in the Doctor
meeting and continue on the "Polling vs Event capture” if needed.
Maybe also start the discussion on what might be the architecture for a
monitoring / notification framework. Not necessarily
including or not
Great, thanks! As I mentioned before, @Zhihui will be the representative
for QTIP on this topic.
I'm sorry for the absence of tomorrow's meeting, dealing with some personal
emergency, and will be out of office next week also. I have expressed most
of my points in mailing list and will continue
Hi,
Of course, I’m interested in such topic. The problem is I cannot join Barometer
meeting as it would be 2 AM in my time zone… I hope someone can take notes.
Doctor project is still candidate to have such discussion. And I’m open to add
them to our meeting agenda. How about having “Polling
11 matches
Mail list logo