[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [availability] Agenda for HA project meeting on Feb. 8

2017-02-06 Thread Fu Qiao
Adding the link for the updates of HA API docs. Please review the patch before the meeting so that we can have an efficient discussion. https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/26663/ -邮件原件- 发件人: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org]

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [test-wg] A survey regarding Open Source VNF Catalogue

2017-02-06 Thread SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
You can reference the info collected on the Models wiki: https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/models/References, and on the Functest wiki at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/functest/List+Of+VNFs As part of the objective of the Models project, we are building a list of VNFs that meet the following

[opnfv-tech-discuss] HA project meeting

2017-02-06 Thread Fu Qiao
BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 15.0 MIMEDIR//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:REQUEST X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [availability] Agenda for HA project meeting on Feb. 8

2017-02-06 Thread Fu Qiao
Hi, all. Below are the logistic for this week's project meeting. According to Yuan Yue's suggestion, we will try zoom this time. Please check out the following link before head and see if you need to download the zoom software. Hope this will work out fine. Agenda: 1, yardstick's current work

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further discussion of NFVI / APP monitoring

2017-02-06 Thread Ryota Mibu
Aaron, OK, I added that topic in today’s agenda for Doctor meeting. Talk to you soon, Ryota From: Aaron Smith [mailto:aasm...@redhat.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 12:06 AM To: Mibu Ryota(壬生 亮太) Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org Subject: Re:

[opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: Re: [qtip][yardstick] Q on integration

2017-02-06 Thread wu.zhihui1
Hi Yardstick team, Sorry I was late for today's working meeting. Yujun send an email to answer Yardstick's questions about this integration[1]. Maybe some committers and contributors missed this email. Hope we can reach a final decision in the end of this week. Thanks! [1]

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 2/10

2017-02-06 Thread Tianhongbo
BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAYLIGHT

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] Danube release status

2017-02-06 Thread David McBride
Team, There seems to be some misunderstanding about the Danube release status. I've had people email me with comments about continuing to integrate with other scenarios or installers, or enabling additional features, etc. To be clear, we are past Milestone 5, which means that features are frozen

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further discussion of NFVI / APP monitoring

2017-02-06 Thread Aaron Smith
Hi Ryota, I think this is a good plan. We can start the discussion in the Doctor meeting and continue on the "Polling vs Event capture” if needed. Maybe also start the discussion on what might be the architecture for a monitoring / notification framework. Not necessarily including or not

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [qtip][yardstick] Q on integration

2017-02-06 Thread Yujun Zhang (ZTE)
Great, thanks! As I mentioned before, @Zhihui will be the representative for QTIP on this topic. I'm sorry for the absence of tomorrow's meeting, dealing with some personal emergency, and will be out of office next week also. I have expressed most of my points in mailing list and will continue

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Further discussion of NFVI / APP monitoring

2017-02-06 Thread Ryota Mibu
Hi, Of course, I’m interested in such topic. The problem is I cannot join Barometer meeting as it would be 2 AM in my time zone… I hope someone can take notes. Doctor project is still candidate to have such discussion. And I’m open to add them to our meeting agenda. How about having “Polling