[opnfv-tech-discuss] reply: [dovetail]dovetail Danube-based cvp planning etherpad

Hi: Thanks wenjing. I have put this link to the dovetail wiki page. It will be easier for people to find this. Best regards hongbo 发件人: Wenjing Chu 发送时间: 2017年2月25日 2:26 收件人: Tianhongbo; 'TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV' 主题: [dovetail]dovetail Danube-based cvp planning etherpad Thanks for everyone in the

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [release] Danube stable branch date and time

Team, I took an action at the last release meeting to specify a specific time for closing the stable branch on March 10. We will close the stable branch at 12 p.m. (noon PST) on March 10. Note that I have another action that is in process to update the stable branch instructions for Danube. I w

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [mano-wg] OPNFV Release-E agreements and Priority and impact of ONAP on MANO Projects- Meeting#20

Hi all, I am adding the agreements we have to date for Release-E -Content for MANO Projects at high level. below. Also I have prioritized based on discussions and debates in MANO WG over last 5 meetings. Tentatively can update Release-E link for MANO

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

You may use history in Github as an automatic query. https://github.com/opnfv/storperf/commits/master/tests On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 8:07 AM Beierl, Mark wrote: > Not really. Tests go with the code change. They are not separate. > > > Regards, > Mark > > *Mark Beierl* > Advisory Solutions Archi

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

Not really. Tests go with the code change. They are not separate. Regards, Mark Mark Beierl Advisory Solutions Architect Dell EMC | Office of the CTO mobile +1 613 314 8106 mark.bei...@dell.com On Feb 24, 2017, at 18:40, David McBride mailto:dmcbr...@linuxfoundatio

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

Mark, Could you send me a git query, instead? For example, for QTIP: https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/q/project:qtip+AND+topic:tests David On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 1:30 PM, Beierl, Mark wrote: > Responses for StorPerf: > > Test Framework Projects > >1. Please provide a list of commits for

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Project proposals for adding analytics to OPNFV

As QTIP PTL, I am particularly interested in Bamboo project. If I understand it correctly, it could be used to develop or deploy (not sure about the way of integration yet) the benchmark hub in QTIP architecture[1]. The benchmark hub is supposed to be a sink of all data produced by QTIP. [1]: ht

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

Yingjun, In order to be part of the release, Opera needs to be running on OPNFV CI. At this point, I think that you will need to defer your project to the E release. David On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 11:55 AM, Yingjun Li wrote: > > > a. > > b.David > > The following is MS6 update about OPERA.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

Team, Thanks for your responses, thus far. However, quite a few of you are forgetting to respond to the *preliminary documentation requirement* that also applies to MS6, in addition to the test case implementation requirement. Preliminary Documentation Requirement 1. Please provide a link

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

Responses for StorPerf: Test Framework Projects 1. Please provide a list of commits for your self-validation tests. As with other projects, the list of commits would be very large. The self-validation occurs on git review, and the Jenkins job can be found here: https://build.opnfv.org/ci/v

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release] E-release schedule

Thanks to everyone for your feedback in this thread. Also, thanks to Ash and Randy with whom I talked at OSLS last week. It's clear from the feedback that the community, including our end users, feel strongly about having additional releases, beyond the standard, 6-month major release cadence. I

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

a. b.David The following is MS6 update about OPERA. c. d.Enabling testing for your project in the Functest repo (or other test framework repo if you are not using functest) e. f. OPERA VNF deployment and test entries has been integrated with FuncTest framework. The integration script

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [project proposal] samplevnf

Hi Brian and Deepak, Thank you for the proposal. How about we discuss it at weekly technical discussion on Thursday March 9th? Our agenda on March 2nd is quite full. Thank you Bin From: opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org [mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss-boun...@lists.opnfv.org] On Behalf Of

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail Danube-based cvp planning etherpad

Thanks for everyone in the call. Per today’s dovetail weekly call, I’ve taken the action item of starting an etherpad for putting together a plan for implementing a Danube-based cvp. This is meant for a high level plan (not detailed work items) that addresses the most important questions for an

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Project proposals for adding analytics to OPNFV

Hi Uli. Yes, some of the x.731 definex states will be looked for. Also states from virtual environments that are not defined. In simple terms looking for what makes a virtual interconnect 'up' or 'down' and the end points. Multi-site (and multi distro. Multi hosts and clusters) is indeed in the

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [project proposal] samplevnf

Hi Morgan You are right this is the same Industry Standard Benchmarking (ISB), which was introduced by Clive in the OPNFV summit#1. As promised at that time, now we delivered the test harness part of that program into the Yardstick project and the VNFs part is the below project proposal. The

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs] Feedback wanted on docs.opnfv.org

Hi Sofia, No immediate feedback on the structure, but the looks of the document. Assuming that the current color theme is also meant for the final release of the documentation, I would like to ask if it is possible to choose a different color for the links (and potentially the text itself)? In

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [netready] OPNFV Hackfest Paris

Hi Prakash, You have a good point. We should revisit the L3VPN use cases and evaluate if the gaps identified there can be solved by Gluon. BTW: Are you planning to attend the plugfest/hackfest? Best regards Georg From: Prakash Ramchandran [mailto:prakash.ramchand...@huawei.com] Sent: Wednesday

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [project proposal] samplevnf

Hi, great! I assume it is what Clive De Souza introduced in OPNFV summit #1, right? we will be happy to play with these VNF approximations representative from the traffic in Functest (it was already identified as a possible task for Danube). We already had some discussions on that some months ago

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [project proposal] samplevnf

Hello OPNFV TSC and OPNFV community, We would like to propose the "samplevnf" project for OPNFV and request your review. Please find the details of the proposed project at https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/PROJ/Project+Proposal%3A+samplevnf . Thanks and Best Regards, Brian J Skerry & Deepak

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][danube] MS6 compliance assessment

Hey David, Here are the requested info for SDNVPN: Enabling testing did happen already in earlier releases but we have added some more test cases this release. It is not completely applicable for us since we enable the test cases in the sdnvpn repo which will be run by functest. Enabling testing

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [qtip] Agenda for weekly meeting 2017-02-27

https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/qtip-meetings-2017-02-27 *# QTIP project weekly meeting on 2017-02-27* - time: UTC0730 - irc://#opnfv-qtip@freenode - index: https://etherpad.opnfv.org/p/qtip-meetings *## Action followup* - [done] akhilbatra to organize a discussion on qtip-api r