Hi everyone,
I agree that the PDF/IDF definitions must be fixed ASAP.
* *About net_config in IDF*: I think it is a bad idea. As i answer in
the patch #42233 [2], if the L3 network is configured in the infra
(firewall, router, ...), and not configurable by the installer, it
must stay
Hi,
I hope I don't offend you about net_config, it is an hard subject, not
easy to summarize, and born during summer holidays without everyone
around the gerrit pit.
About network naming, I understand the need of anonymize the networks
parts to not over specify the installer level, but by
Hi Alexandru,
thanks for this big set of patches and a sum up of our last pdf discussions.
The part about net_config is quite confuse, specially because you sum up
many problems already solved by net_config, but talking about PDF not
having it, then talking about what add net_config... but it
Hi,
Thanks Alexandru, you clearly resume the discussion.
I wrote that IDF for baremetal xci with the need to bring more
flexibility to PDF (and then SDF) that are quite rigid by design (but
must stay as it, as they are reference for every one). It seems that we
are several to have the same
