Hunter (donaldh); Yujun Zhang
Cc: test...@lists.opnfv.org; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] Draft support for presentation to TSC
Hi Morgan,
Coming back to this old thread after the TSC discussion today.
My feeling is that the argument tha
Hi Morgan,
Coming back to this old thread after the TSC discussion today.
My feeling is that the argument that we have to do stress testing on the
N-1 release because the installers are not available early in the cycle
is an argument for changing the release process (or converting it to a
<test...@lists.opnfv.org>,
"opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org" <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV] Draft support for presentation to TSC
+1 on the growing importance of resilience and stress testing.
I'd like to offer support of
+1 on the growing importance of resilience and stress testing.
I'd like to offer support of your effort from the CVP perspectives:
One is that resiliency testing is one of the prime candidates for CVP in E
release in my mind. The TC3, for instance, is a great example.
And the second point,
Hi Morgan,
Sure, I can present the beginning for the stress test in Danube.
One quick question, do we need to add a brief list for the stress test cases
under planning?
By the way, do you have a pptx version of your slides? So that we can modify
the slides cooperatively. The odp version looks
