Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][hackfest] Release Milestone Review presentation

sts.opnfv.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 11:22:18 AM Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][hackfest] Release Milestone Review presentation This is absolutely one of the value-adds that OPNFV brings to the table – very much in line w

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][hackfest] Release Milestone Review presentation

le...@lists.opnfv.org>; TECH-DISCUSS OPNFV <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>> Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][hackfest] Release Milestone Review presentation It feels like perhaps we need a more nuanced

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][hackfest] Release Milestone Review presentation

Hi Heather, Please see inline. Tim Rozet Red Hat SDN Team - Original Message - From: "Heather Kirksey" To: "Tim Rozet" Cc: "David McBride" , opnfv-project-le...@lists.opnfv.org, "Christopher Price"

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][hackfest] Release Milestone Review presentation

It feels like perhaps we need a more nuanced understanding of what we mean by our "use" of upstream components. If I am understanding some of the conversations correctly, Be might be more generally overall stable, but doesn't enable key capabilities (or has higher instability) around VPN and SFC

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-project-leads] [release][hackfest] Release Milestone Review presentation

I don't see any issue here. Colorado 1.0 is set to use Beryllium, which is already released. Even the scenarios that require Boron (FDS/SFC) do not require ODL HA, and we already have Boron RC builds that work. ODL HA is known to be buggy, so at least in Apex we don't enable it. Tim Rozet