Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [qtip][yardstick] Q on integration

2017-02-06 Thread Yujun Zhang (ZTE)
Great, thanks! As I mentioned before, @Zhihui will be the representative for QTIP on this topic. I'm sorry for the absence of tomorrow's meeting, dealing with some personal emergency, and will be out of office next week also. I have expressed most of my points in mailing list and will continue

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [qtip][yardstick] Q on integration

2017-02-05 Thread Gaoliang (kubi)
Hi Yujun, Sure, I added the topic into this week meeting agenda[1](US time slot with GTM), hope we will have a great discussion at the meeting. [1] https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/yardstick/Meetings Regards, Kubi From: Yujun Zhang [mailto:zhangyujun+...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, February 05,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [qtip][yardstick] Q on integration

2017-02-04 Thread Yujun Zhang
Dear yardsticker, As suggested in last yardstick meeting[1], I've updated the QTIP architecture to introduce an even more simpler plugin mode[2]. We may discuss it in next Yardstick meeting. Do you think it will be OK? @Kubi The discussion has been lasting for months IIRC. We really need to

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [qtip][yardstick] Q on integration

2017-01-23 Thread Yujun Zhang
Dear all I reviewed the meeting log[1] and it seems we have several questions to clarify. Feel free to comment. 1. how to integrate option 1: as a server like original proposal[2] option 2: as a module Both are OK to me, if it is YardStick's team to decide to integrate as a module, we need to