[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]action item from dovetail : management of dovetail scripts

Hi Aric: Do you have time for a talk. I have an action item from dovetail. Now, we are trying to upload the documents and scripts to the dovetail repos. But , there are at least two branches: master and C release. The master branch will be used for the D release. The goal of the dovetail is to

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] For the issue about the notification time is large than 1S

Hi, So all and all. Surely need something fixed in FUEL installation, but also Inspector needs to work fast enough in scale. Optimally this means it needs to be aware on VMs running on host, so there will not be any extra time spent figuring out that when failure occurs. Also currently there

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Pharos][DOCS]Use artifacts to update WIKI of Pharos Labs.

Hi All, In last INFRA WG meeting, there is a suggestion that no directly editing WIKI pages of Pharos Labs, but editing the original files in Pharos repo and then including these documents in repo or rendered files in artifact's website. There is a AP for me to have some test and try for ZTE

[opnfv-tech-discuss] []bottlenecks]step down the bottlenecks PTL

Hi all: I need to pay more effort to the Dovetail and I will have no enough time for the bottlenecks contribution. I will step down the bottlenecks PTL. Thanks for all your support. Later, there will be new PTL election for the bottlenecks. Best Regards hongbo

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] For the issue about the notification time is large than 1S

Hi, Carlos According to the data collected by @Wenjuan, it seems when the test fails, most time is consumed by the inspector api disable_compute_host[1] if event_type == 'compute.host.down': inspector.disable_compute_host(hostname) I checked the source code and it looks it will

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] How to propose topics for D-release

Hi, To track our activity, we have to use JIRA. Spec review in gerrit could be additional step for our design discussion. In OpenStack, developers are using Launchpad (similar to JIRA) as well as gerrit for spec discussion. Thinking of size and characteristic of Doctors, I prefer to avoid an

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 9/9

Hi all: Here is the minutes of dovetail weekly meeting Minutes of DoveTail Discussion * Date and Time: Friday at 1400-1500 UTC, September 9, 2016 * Convener: Hongbo Tian (Huawei) * Participants: * Bin Hu

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Plugfest]

Hello All, For today's meeting, we have a fairly light agenda. *Call Details:* - Monday, September 12, 2016 - Time: 7:00am - 8:00am Pacific Time - GoToMeeting logistics - https://global.gotomeeting.com/join/620955781 - You can also dial in using your phone. - United States :

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] How to propose topics for D-release

Sounds good. We have already started creating JIRA ticket for proposals. -- Yujun On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 8:08 PM Ryota Mibu wrote: > Hi, > > > > > > To track our activity, we have to use JIRA. Spec review in gerrit could be > additional step for our design discussion. In

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfvdocs] [opnfv-project-leads] Document links needed for Colorado release

To all projects that are expected to provide documentation to the Colorado release. Hi, We need to collect all document links that should be included in the release library. I have created a wiki page to compile this information and I need help to ensure that we cover every project.

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Pharos][DOCS]Use artifacts to update WIKI of Pharos Labs.

Julien, Thanks for looking into this issue. I had a chat with Trevor (LF) on IRC about this topic. We came up with the following proposal to discuss in the next Infra WG meeting (I've added this to the agenda) Proposal: 0) Goal is to reduce

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [OPNFV Helpdesk #29825] [linuxfoundation.org #29825] Re: [Pharos][DOCS]Use artifacts to update WIKI of Pharos Labs.

Julien, Thanks for looking into this issue. I had a chat with Trevor (LF) on IRC about this topic. We came up with the following proposal to discuss in the next Infra WG meeting (I've added this to the agenda) Proposal: 0) Goal is to reduce duplication of documentation for labs as we have both

[opnfv-tech-discuss] OpenDaylight Boron RC3.5

Hello OPNFV, ODL RC3.5 just finished building. Info: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2016-September/008277.html Tar/zip: https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/autorelease-1495/org/opendaylight/integration/distribution-karaf/0.5.0-Boron/ RPM:

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [release] D-release schedule

Reminder... if you haven't yet reviewed the schedule, please do so before the TSC and release meetings on Tuesday, where it will likely be discussed. David On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 3:45 PM, David McBride wrote: > Team, > > I've posted an update to the schedule >

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [release][jira] OPNFV JIRA status

Team, See attachment for the latest OPNFV JIRA report. We still have 235 unresolved issues assigned to Colorado 1.0. Given that we are less than two weeks from the Colorado 1.0 release, these should be reassigned to future releases, unless you are confident that they will be resolved and closed

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: Models Weekly Meeting B

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:CANCEL PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:Pacific Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T02 TZOFFSETFROM:-0700 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=1SU;BYMONTH=11 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Nomations for the 2016 OPNFV Committer Board Election

All, I'd like to start the nomination period for the OPNFV Committer Board election. OPNFV Committers as listed on https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/DEV/2016+Committer+Board+Election+-+Committers+List will be eligible to run for and vote in the Committer Board election. If you'd like to nominate

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] For the issue about the notification time is large than 1S

Following up also the discussion in https://gerrit.opnfv.org/gerrit/#/c/20877/ It just remind me of something. Is there a guideline on how the inspector should behave to achieve the targeted performance from Doctor project? e.g. be topology awareness, simultaneously set all affected host to error

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [testperf] weekly meeting

-20160912-184600.ics Description: application/ics ___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [opnfv-mano-wg] Agenda for Meeting Wednesday

Please refer to link for meeting Agenda on 14th this Wednesday https://wiki.opnfv.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6827111 Meeting Times: Every 2nd and 4th Wednesday at 20:30pm UTC (1:30pm PDT) IRC#opnfv-mano (meetbot is set for meeting minutes) GOTOMEETING: 1. Please join my

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Summary of Sept. Board meeting

HI OPNFVer's, Please find below the summary of the board meeting. Question are welcome. * OPNFV membership update & new Board member introduction: There was an update on new OPNFV Associate & Silver members plus Board membership. * Audit & Finance Committee report out: There was a review of