[opnfv-tech-discuss] [multisite]Weekly meeting of Nov.24

Hello, team, Agenda of Nov.24 2016 * Kingbird feature implementation * Kingbird to be an OpenStack official project? * Funstest dependency issue and Kingbird test IRC: http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=opnfv-meeting 8:00-9:00 UTC (During winter time, means CET 9:00 AM). Other topics are

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor] Danube plan overview

Hi doctors, I'm reviewing the requirement document for an internal presentation. There is a release plan for Arno and it looks good[1]. We have already sorted out the working items for Danube release, but it would be better if we can have an overview about the goals we want to achieve. @Ryota,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] RE : [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

Do not hesitate to use the swagger interface described in http://artifacts.opnfv.org/functest/docs/devguide/index.html There are discussions on the etherpad on the evolution of the data model, feel free to contribute /Morgan Envoyé de mon Galaxy Note 4 d'Orange Message d'origine

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar]:next call

Hi, The biweekly OPNFV C call is on Monday at 10, a VCO sync call is at 11am on Monday, Tuesday at 9 is open for me, and while I have a conflict at 10 on Wednesday, I don't see anything OPNFV related that conflicts between 10 and 12 that day. My vote would be for 9am on Tuesday (EST). Thanks,

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail weekly meeting 11/25

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:China Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:+0800 TZOFFSETTO:+0800 END:DAYLIGHT

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar]:next call

Dave thanks Ok there is a proposal for 9am Tue. Any others? On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 20:24 Dave Neary wrote: > Hi, > > The biweekly OPNFV C call is on Monday at 10, a VCO sync call is at > 11am on Monday, Tuesday at 9 is open for me, and while I have a conflict > at 10 on

[opnfv-tech-discuss] NetReady weekly meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Europe Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [doctor][ves][barometer] Metrics and Events Requirements High Level List

Hi folks I've started a wiki to collect Metrics and Events Requirements from the VES and Doctor Project to Barometer (https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/fastpath/Metrics+and+Events+Requirements+High+Level+List ). The intention of this wiki is to list the metrics and events we need/would like to

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Meetings discussion (GoToMeeting, meetings info on wiki, etc)

Continuing the conversation from the TSC call... - One proposal was to have a single recurring meeting per each GTM account (tech-proje...@opnfv.org & tech-projec...@opnfv.org) so that individual project meeting won't get disconnected when someone else dials for another meeting with

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar]:next call

I need comments on time. On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 13:44 Ash wrote: > Awesome! Thanks! > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Christopher Price < > chrispric...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I agree Ash, that should be the priority for the next call. > > Once we have a time right

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

Hello, Sorry for misplacing the email, but I know someone sent out information on the test results API being refactored quite a number of months ago. Where can I find the latest documentation on how to post results? Regards, Mark Mark Beierl Advisory Solutions Architect Dell EMC | Office of

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] 答复: [doctor] question on code refactoring task (DOCTOR-71)

In fact, the error starts with Wenjuan's reply :-) Could you check @wenjuan? On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:50 PM Carlos Goncalves < carlos.goncal...@neclab.eu> wrote: > It seems like when I replied to Yujun’s emails I sent to the > opnfv-tech-discuss-bounces address. > > Please see below my reply.

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: Infra Working Group Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Infra Working Group Weekly Meeting DESCRIPTION:The "Infra Working Group" plans and tracks infrastructure cross project initiatives and reports these up to the TSC to ensure we are able to provide

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Cancelled: Infra Working Group Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR PRODID://Yahoo//Calendar//EN VERSION:2.0 METHOD:CANCEL BEGIN:VEVENT SUMMARY:Infra Working Group Weekly Meeting DESCRIPTION:The "Infra Working Group" plans and tracks infrastructure cross project initiatives and reports these up to the TSC to ensure we are able to provide

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Canceled: Infra Working Group Weekly Meeting

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:CANCEL PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:UTC-08 BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:16010101T00 TZOFFSETFROM:-0800 TZOFFSETTO:-0800 END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Infra Working Group Weekly Meeting Asia Time slot

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Europe Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT

[opnfv-tech-discuss] Infra Working Group Weekly Meeting Asia Time slot

BEGIN:VCALENDAR METHOD:REQUEST PRODID:Microsoft Exchange Server 2010 VERSION:2.0 BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:W. Europe Standard Time BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:16010101T03 TZOFFSETFROM:+0200 TZOFFSETTO:+0100 RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;INTERVAL=1;BYDAY=-1SU;BYMONTH=10 END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT

[opnfv-tech-discuss] MANO-Related Project Huddle at Hackfest

Hi all, I created a page where we can organize around the agenda and attendance at a 3-hour session on Thurs 8th (8:00-11:00) on MANO-related projects and cross-project topics. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Colorado+Hackfest-MANO+project+huddle Depending upon the number of project

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Functest Addition for Barometer

Hi Calin, I think this is more than enough. It would be appreciated if you create a wiki page with this information, so that we can link it from JIRA/gerrit if needed. About the procedure you have described, point 2 is not needed. We are trying to get rid of exec_tests.sh in Danube and use all

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

Hi Mark, If you want to post results you need: 1) Project declarated in the DB. Done for Storperf: http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf 2) Declare test cases under the project. Currently 1 test for Storperf:

[opnfv-tech-discuss] [dovetail]dovetail meeting for the OPNFV plugfest and Hackfest

Hi all: We have a time slot for dovetail meeting in the OPNFV. We will talk about the test cases, test categories and test tools, and so on. This time, we have chance to have f2f meeting. https://wiki.opnfv.org/display/EVNT/Co-located+Plugfest-Hackfest+Planning+Page if you have other topics,

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar]:next call

Hi Margaret, One of the main things we've been waiting to address is the charter for Polestar now that SPC has been disbanded, since it's what sanctioned Polestar. In our last two meetings, we've hit this subject and then postpone further talks until it gets addressed. While I don't have a

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar]:next call

I agree Ash, that should be the priority for the next call.  Once we have a time right I’ll set the agenda and publish the materials I was going to present last week for Margaret to use for the call. / Chris From: on behalf of Ash

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [polestar]:next call

Awesome! Thanks! On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Christopher Price wrote: > I agree Ash, that should be the priority for the next call. > > Once we have a time right I’ll set the agenda and publish the materials I > was going to present last week for Margaret to use