Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

2016-11-30 Thread feng.xiaowei
Hi Mark,

For now we don't have bulk removing function using TestAPI. And I doubt it is a 
good idea to have it. 

All the results pushed to testresults.opnfv.org's TestDB must be meaningful, as 
it is kind of an official purpose. 

If someone wants to use TestAPI as development purpose, I suggest deploying a 
local enviroments to 

save the test results, instead of pushing the results to testresults.opnfv.org 
and delete them soon after.






BRs


Serena









E: feng.xiao...@zte.com.cn 





Original Mail



Sender: Beierl,Mark
To: RICHOMME Morgan IMT/OLN
CC: <opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Date: 2016/11/25 23:06
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API 
(testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation





Does the DELETE support query?  Or is there a method of bulk removing results 
that were created as part of development? 










 
Regards,

Mark
 











Mark Beierl

Advisory Solutions Architect

Dell EMC | Office  of the CTO

mobile +1 613 314 8106

mark.bei...@dell.com






















 
On Nov 23, 2016, at 01:49, morgan.richo...@orange.com wrote:
 


Do not hesitate to use the swagger interface described in 
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/functest/docs/devguide/index.html
 
There are discussions on the etherpad on the evolution of the data model, feel 
free to contribute 
 
/Morgan
 

Envoyé de mon Galaxy Note 4 d'Orange

  Message d'origine  De : Jose Lausuch 
<jose.laus...@ericsson.com>  Date : 22/11/2016 23:59 (GMT+01:00)  À : Mark 
Beierl <mark.bei...@dell.com>  Cc : opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org  Objet : 
Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API 
(testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation  
 
Hi Mark, If you want to post results you need: 1) Project declarated in the DB. 
Done for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf 2) Declare test 
cases under the project. Currently 1 test for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf/cases Once that 
is done, you need to do a call to the test api from your code. This is an 
example using python: 
https://git.opnfv.org/functest/tree/functest/utils/functest_utils.py#n185 The 
api is on http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/api/v1 and this is the model schema 
you need to post a result: {   "project_name": "",   "scenario": "",   
"stop_date": “",   "case_name": "",   "build_tag": "",   "version": "",   
"pod_name": "",   "criteria": "",   "installer": "",   "start_date": "",   
"details": "" } Serena can help out since she is in charge of the API/DB. 
Regards, Jose > On 22 Nov 2016, at 22:36, Beierl, Mark <mark.bei...@dell.com> 
wrote: >  > Hello, >  > Sorry for misplacing the email, but I know someone sent 
out information on the test results API being refactored quite a number of 
months ago.  Where can I find the latest documentation on how to post results? 
>  > Regards, > Mark >  > Mark Beierl > Advisory Solutions Architect > Dell EMC 
| Office of the CTO > mobile +1 613 314 8106 > mark.bei...@dell.com >  > 
___ > opnfv-tech-discuss mailing 
list > opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org > 
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss 
___ opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org 
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss 
 
_
  Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc pas etre diffuses, exploites 
ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez 
le signaler a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les 
messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, Orange decline toute 
responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.  This 
message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information 
that may be protected by law they should not be distributed, used or copied 
without authorisation. If you have received this email in error, please notify 
the sender and delete this message and its attachments. As emails may be 
altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or 
falsified. Thank you.___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss


Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

2016-11-25 Thread Beierl, Mark
Does the DELETE support query?  Or is there a method of bulk removing results 
that were created as part of development?

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
Advisory Solutions Architect
Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
mobile +1 613 314 8106
mark.bei...@dell.com

On Nov 23, 2016, at 01:49, 
morgan.richo...@orange.com wrote:

Do not hesitate to use the swagger interface described in 
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/functest/docs/devguide/index.html

There are discussions on the etherpad on the evolution of the data model, feel 
free to contribute

/Morgan



Envoyé de mon Galaxy Note 4 d'Orange


 Message d'origine 
De : Jose Lausuch >
Date : 22/11/2016 23:59 (GMT+01:00)
À : Mark Beierl >
Cc : 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Objet : Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API 
(testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) 
Documentation

Hi Mark,

If you want to post results you need:

1) Project declarated in the DB. Done for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf
2) Declare test cases under the project. Currently 1 test for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf/cases

Once that is done, you need to do a call to the test api from your code. This 
is an example using python:
https://git.opnfv.org/functest/tree/functest/utils/functest_utils.py#n185


The api is on http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/api/v1 and this is the model 
schema you need to post a result:

{
  "project_name": "",
  "scenario": "",
  "stop_date": “",
  "case_name": "",
  "build_tag": "",
  "version": "",
  "pod_name": "",
  "criteria": "",
  "installer": "",
  "start_date": "",
  "details": ""
}

Serena can help out since she is in charge of the API/DB.

Regards,
Jose



> On 22 Nov 2016, at 22:36, Beierl, Mark 
> > wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for misplacing the email, but I know someone sent out information on 
> the test results API being refactored quite a number of months ago.  Where 
> can I find the latest documentation on how to post results?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> Mark Beierl
> Advisory Solutions Architect
> Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
> mobile +1 613 314 8106
> mark.bei...@dell.com
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss


Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

2016-11-23 Thread Beierl, Mark
I just added intel-pod9, that is why it is declared :)

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
Advisory Solutions Architect
Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
mobile +1 613 314 8106
mark.bei...@dell.com

On Nov 23, 2016, at 09:52, Jose Lausuch 
> wrote:

Hi Mark,


As far as I can tell, intel-pod9 is declared.
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/pods/intel-pod9

It could be also that the test case name you are using is not declared. I see 
only a test case named “storperf” in the DB:
http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/api/v1/projects/storperf


Regards,
Jose


From: Beierl, Mark [mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 15:11 PM
To: RICHOMME Morgan IMT/OLN
Cc: Jose Lausuch; 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API 
(testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) 
Documentation

Thank you.  That is the document I was looking for.

From that I found out that intel-pod9 is not registered as a pod, and that is 
why I was getting the 404 when doing the HTTP POST.

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
Advisory Solutions Architect
Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
mobile +1 613 314 8106
mark.bei...@dell.com

On Nov 23, 2016, at 01:49, 
morgan.richo...@orange.com wrote:

Do not hesitate to use the swagger interface described in 
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/functest/docs/devguide/index.html

There are discussions on the etherpad on the evolution of the data model, feel 
free to contribute

/Morgan



Envoyé de mon Galaxy Note 4 d'Orange


 Message d'origine 
De : Jose Lausuch >
Date : 22/11/2016 23:59 (GMT+01:00)
À : Mark Beierl >
Cc : 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Objet : Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API 
(testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) 
Documentation
Hi Mark,

If you want to post results you need:

1) Project declarated in the DB. Done for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf
2) Declare test cases under the project. Currently 1 test for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf/cases

Once that is done, you need to do a call to the test api from your code. This 
is an example using python:
https://git.opnfv.org/functest/tree/functest/utils/functest_utils.py#n185


The api is on http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/api/v1 and this is the model 
schema you need to post a result:

{
  "project_name": "",
  "scenario": "",
  "stop_date": “",
  "case_name": "",
  "build_tag": "",
  "version": "",
  "pod_name": "",
  "criteria": "",
  "installer": "",
  "start_date": "",
  "details": ""
}

Serena can help out since she is in charge of the API/DB.

Regards,
Jose



> On 22 Nov 2016, at 22:36, Beierl, Mark 
> > wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for misplacing the email, but I know someone sent out information on 
> the test results API being refactored quite a number of months ago.  Where 
> can I find the latest documentation on how to post results?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> Mark Beierl
> Advisory Solutions Architect
> Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
> mobile +1 613 314 8106
> mark.bei...@dell.com
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without 

Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

2016-11-23 Thread Jose Lausuch
Hi Mark,


As far as I can tell, intel-pod9 is declared.
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/pods/intel-pod9

It could be also that the test case name you are using is not declared. I see 
only a test case named "storperf" in the DB:
http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/api/v1/projects/storperf


Regards,
Jose


From: Beierl, Mark [mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 15:11 PM
To: RICHOMME Morgan IMT/OLN
Cc: Jose Lausuch; opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API 
(testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

Thank you.  That is the document I was looking for.

>From that I found out that intel-pod9 is not registered as a pod, and that is 
>why I was getting the 404 when doing the HTTP POST.

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
Advisory Solutions Architect
Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
mobile +1 613 314 8106
mark.bei...@dell.com<mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com>

On Nov 23, 2016, at 01:49, 
morgan.richo...@orange.com<mailto:morgan.richo...@orange.com> wrote:

Do not hesitate to use the swagger interface described in 
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/functest/docs/devguide/index.html

There are discussions on the etherpad on the evolution of the data model, feel 
free to contribute

/Morgan



Envoyé de mon Galaxy Note 4 d'Orange


 Message d'origine 
De : Jose Lausuch <jose.laus...@ericsson.com<mailto:jose.laus...@ericsson.com>>
Date : 22/11/2016 23:59 (GMT+01:00)
À : Mark Beierl <mark.bei...@dell.com<mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com>>
Cc : 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
Objet : Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API 
(testresults.opnfv.org/test/api<http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/api>) 
Documentation
Hi Mark,

If you want to post results you need:

1) Project declarated in the DB. Done for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf<http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/api/v1/projects/storperf>
2) Declare test cases under the project. Currently 1 test for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf/cases<http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/api/v1/projects/storperf/cases>

Once that is done, you need to do a call to the test api from your code. This 
is an example using python:
https://git.opnfv.org/functest/tree/functest/utils/functest_utils.py#n185


The api is on http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/api/v1 and this is the model 
schema you need to post a result:

{
  "project_name": "",
  "scenario": "",
  "stop_date": "",
  "case_name": "",
  "build_tag": "",
  "version": "",
  "pod_name": "",
  "criteria": "",
  "installer": "",
  "start_date": "",
  "details": ""
}

Serena can help out since she is in charge of the API/DB.

Regards,
Jose



> On 22 Nov 2016, at 22:36, Beierl, Mark 
> <mark.bei...@dell.com<mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com>> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for misplacing the email, but I know someone sent out information on 
> the test results API being refactored quite a number of months ago.  Where 
> can I find the latest documentation on how to post results?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> Mark Beierl
> Advisory Solutions Architect
> Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
> mobile +1 613 314 8106
> mark.bei...@dell.com<mailto:mark.bei...@dell.com>
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org<mailto:opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org>
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

_



Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc

pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler

a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,

Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.



This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;

they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.

If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.

As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.

Thank you.

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss


Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

2016-11-23 Thread Beierl, Mark
Thank you.  That is the document I was looking for.

>From that I found out that intel-pod9 is not registered as a pod, and that is 
>why I was getting the 404 when doing the HTTP POST.

Regards,
Mark

Mark Beierl
Advisory Solutions Architect
Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
mobile +1 613 314 8106
mark.bei...@dell.com

On Nov 23, 2016, at 01:49, 
morgan.richo...@orange.com wrote:

Do not hesitate to use the swagger interface described in 
http://artifacts.opnfv.org/functest/docs/devguide/index.html

There are discussions on the etherpad on the evolution of the data model, feel 
free to contribute

/Morgan



Envoyé de mon Galaxy Note 4 d'Orange


 Message d'origine 
De : Jose Lausuch >
Date : 22/11/2016 23:59 (GMT+01:00)
À : Mark Beierl >
Cc : 
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
Objet : Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API 
(testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) 
Documentation

Hi Mark,

If you want to post results you need:

1) Project declarated in the DB. Done for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf
2) Declare test cases under the project. Currently 1 test for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf/cases

Once that is done, you need to do a call to the test api from your code. This 
is an example using python:
https://git.opnfv.org/functest/tree/functest/utils/functest_utils.py#n185


The api is on http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/api/v1 and this is the model 
schema you need to post a result:

{
  "project_name": "",
  "scenario": "",
  "stop_date": “",
  "case_name": "",
  "build_tag": "",
  "version": "",
  "pod_name": "",
  "criteria": "",
  "installer": "",
  "start_date": "",
  "details": ""
}

Serena can help out since she is in charge of the API/DB.

Regards,
Jose



> On 22 Nov 2016, at 22:36, Beierl, Mark 
> > wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Sorry for misplacing the email, but I know someone sent out information on 
> the test results API being refactored quite a number of months ago.  Where 
> can I find the latest documentation on how to post results?
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
> Mark Beierl
> Advisory Solutions Architect
> Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
> mobile +1 613 314 8106
> mark.bei...@dell.com
>
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

_

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.


___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss


Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] [Functest] [Yardstick] Test Results API (testresults.opnfv.org/test/api) Documentation

2016-11-22 Thread Jose Lausuch
Hi Mark,

If you want to post results you need:

1) Project declarated in the DB. Done for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf
2) Declare test cases under the project. Currently 1 test for Storperf: 
http://testresults.opnfv.org:80/test/api/v1/projects/storperf/cases

Once that is done, you need to do a call to the test api from your code. This 
is an example using python:
https://git.opnfv.org/functest/tree/functest/utils/functest_utils.py#n185


The api is on http://testresults.opnfv.org/test/api/v1 and this is the model 
schema you need to post a result:

{
  "project_name": "",
  "scenario": "",
  "stop_date": “",
  "case_name": "",
  "build_tag": "",
  "version": "",
  "pod_name": "",
  "criteria": "",
  "installer": "",
  "start_date": "",
  "details": ""
}

Serena can help out since she is in charge of the API/DB.

Regards,
Jose



> On 22 Nov 2016, at 22:36, Beierl, Mark  wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Sorry for misplacing the email, but I know someone sent out information on 
> the test results API being refactored quite a number of months ago.  Where 
> can I find the latest documentation on how to post results?
> 
> Regards,
> Mark
> 
> Mark Beierl
> Advisory Solutions Architect
> Dell EMC | Office of the CTO
> mobile +1 613 314 8106
> mark.bei...@dell.com
> 
> ___
> opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
> opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
> https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss

___
opnfv-tech-discuss mailing list
opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org
https://lists.opnfv.org/mailman/listinfo/opnfv-tech-discuss