.org; degirmenci, fatih <
>> fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com>; Raymond Paik
>> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Anteater status and link issue
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:32 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <
ary 12, 2018 9:04 AM
> *To:* SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
> *Cc:* opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; degirmenci, fatih <
> fatih.degirme...@ericsson.com>; Raymond Paik
> *Subject:* Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Anteater status and link issue
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue,
Comments etc inline
Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T
From: Luke Hinds [mailto:lhi...@redhat.com]
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2018 9:04 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L)
Cc: opnfv-tech-discuss@lists.opnfv.org; degirmenci, fatih
; Raymond Paik
Subject: Re: [opnfv-tech-discuss] Anteater status
On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:32 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L (BRYAN L) <
bryan.sulli...@research.att.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’m wondering where the Anteater program is – and want to note a broken
> link: build jobs with Anteater violations reference “Please visit:
> https://wiki.opnfv.org/x/5oey”, whi
Hi Bryan,
I’m sure Luke will respond to this mail as well but let me put our experience
here as a user of this tool.
We have been using Anteater for a while now – we started running it against
patches around the middle of last year.
The tool definitely helped us to catch and fix some crucial th
