Re: PAX Wicket 4 (moving to wicket 8)

Hi Christoph Looks like WICKET-6402 already are resolved? On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 10:03 AM, 'Christoph Läubrich' via OPS4J < ops4j@googlegroups.com> wrote: > As long as there are no API-breaks within Pax-Wicket it doesen't matter, > client-code has to choose of course if the want 7 or 8, but

Re: [pax-web-jsp] Can pax-web-jsp handle simple custom tags with .tag (not .tld) extension in a WAB (not WAR)?

If the ticket comments can explain what *should* work (esp from an annotation perspective), given the scenario, I can try and help dig around. On Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 3:58:48 PM UTC-4, Achim Nierbeck wrote: > > Hi, > > first of all thanks for the issue and the detailed description :) >

Re: [pax-web-jsp] Can pax-web-jsp handle simple custom tags with .tag (not .tld) extension in a WAB (not WAR)?

Hi, first of all thanks for the issue and the detailed description :) regarding your first mail, I don't mind questions at all, so shoot as much as possible at me, I try to answer as much as possible, sometimes I might not know the answer :) Regarding the tracker, yes I really would like to have

Re: [pax-web-jsp] Can pax-web-jsp handle simple custom tags with .tag (not .tld) extension in a WAB (not WAR)?

Created https://ops4j1.jira.com/projects/PAXWEB/issues/PAXWEB-1106 to report what I found (was able to trim it down to one Java file, plus the jsp/tag files) On Tuesday, June 20, 2017 at 10:15:26 AM UTC-4, Eben Stewart wrote: > > (I hope you don't mind all these questions - I am trying to

Re: [REGISTER] Joining ops4j1.jira.com and discussing feature request

Regarding the HttpContext issue. The HttpService spec says what can be done, and what can't be done. If you want to have a different behavior then the osgi spec regarding the HttpService please use the WebContainer, or use what is possible according to the OSGi Whiteboard specification. regards,

Re: [REGISTER] Joining ops4j1.jira.com and discussing feature request

Hi, We can create your account, just need your preferred ID. Regards JB On 06/20/2017 12:06 PM, Lukasz Lech wrote: I’ve registerd in Attlassian, and then I’ve got the message when I logged in and went to ops4j1: Due to increased SPAM and fake accounts, the self-registration has been

RE: [REGISTER] Joining ops4j1.jira.com and discussing feature request

I’ve registerd in Attlassian, and then I’ve got the message when I logged in and went to ops4j1: Due to increased SPAM and fake accounts, the self-registration has been disabled. Sorry for the inconvenience. Contact the OPS4J General list to have an account created. From:

Re: [REGISTER] Joining ops4j1.jira.com and discussing feature request

Hi, Did you already request an id on Jira ? Regards JB On 06/20/2017 11:50 AM, Lukasz Lech wrote: Hello, I’d like to join https://ops4j1.jira.com and as the message states, I need to apply here to register. The background is the problem with pax-web behavior

[REGISTER] Joining ops4j1.jira.com and discussing feature request

Hello, I'd like to join https://ops4j1.jira.com and as the message states, I need to apply here to register. The background is the problem with pax-web behavior of creating separate HttpContext for each bundle when createDefaultHttpContext() is called. I'd like to be able to change that

Re: [PROPOSAL] New pax project 'transx'

I already started https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.jms for JMS a while ago so you are maybe interested in adding the pooling-feature there also? In fact pooling and recovery can be nicly integrated into OSGi using the service factory, so a switch over would be simply register/unregister

Re: PAX Wicket 4 (moving to wicket 8)

As long as there are no API-breaks within Pax-Wicket it doesen't matter, client-code has to choose of course if the want 7 or 8, but I can only check this if Wicket adds OSGi-Headers, so sign up at the Wicket JIRA and vote for the issue ;-) Am 19.06.2017 20:44, schrieb nino martinez wael: