Dear OpsAWG WG,
We believe that there is sufficient support (taking into account
comments reveived during both this, and the previous WGLC) for
progressing this document, and so will
be submitting it to the IESG for publication.
Thank you for your review and feedback,
W and T.
On Wed, Jun 15,
I support adoption of this work.
On 8/3/2016 3:14 AM, Zhoutianran wrote:
Dear OPSAWG,
The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following
document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.
Manufacturer Usage Description Specification:
Hi Matjaz,
others on this list have more insight in the availability and interoperability
of implementations, and Robert has
already provided some information. If and when the WG decides that it is time
to proceed the RFC to maturity level
Internet Standard we would be happy to cooperate.
Best
Hi Bert,
On 8/3/16 12:54 PM, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote:
> M
>
> - first I wonder why this document has "netmod" in the draftname".
> it is targeted at opsawg, and besides, it not only has a YANG
> datamodel, but also talks bout DHCP, x509 and LLDP.
> So people should be aware that this
M
- first I wonder why this document has "netmod" in the draftname".
it is targeted at opsawg, and besides, it not only has a YANG
datamodel, but also talks bout DHCP, x509 and LLDP.
So people should be aware that this is more than just YANG data model.
- the document also refers to
