Hi Bert,
On 8/3/16 12:54 PM, Bert Wijnen (IETF) wrote: > Mmmmm > > - first I wonder why this document has "netmod" in the draftname". > it is targeted at opsawg, and besides, it not only has a YANG > datamodel, but also talks bout DHCP, x509 and LLDP. > So people should be aware that this is more than just YANG data model. Long history. Short answer is that if approved it would be renamed accordingly, and if you see content that seemingly focuses just too much on the model, then we should balance it off. To that end... > - the document also refers to draft-lear-mud-framework-00 (now expired) > in the introduction section. So should we also adopt that document > or is its content now included (or will it be included) in this > document that we want to adopt as opsawg work item? We haven't updated the framework doc because we've been consolidating all the other ones into one work. I would be perfectly happy to continue that consolidation (it would be non-normative text as the framework is). > > I do support this work in opsawg, but would like to see above 2 points > clarified. I am willing to review future versions Thanks, Eliot
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
