[ the major crypto authentication done, so another author who did it
your comments would be appreciated ]
A new version of I-D, draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Randy Bush and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-ge
Indeed, thank you Benoit for the detailed review. The authors are currently
analyzing your feedback and will be preparing an updated draft as we feel that
progressing the draft through the WG is the correct approach.
Best regards,
Joey
From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2020
Sorry for being late to close this out.
While there was a few support emails from opsawg, they were overshadowed by
some technical concerns from the LSR WG (who arguably would be vested in the
implementation of draft). The chairs don’t feel that there is enough support
to adopt this work in it
Hi Italo,
> Regarding the approach, my preference is to include in the common
> module all the types/groupings which are common.
I think that you are arguing to add to the common module even nodes that are
only applicable to L3 or L2 such as nodes that are common between L3NM and L3SM
or L2NM
-邮件原件-
发件人: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com]
发送时间: 2020年9月3日 19:17
收件人: Wubo (lana) ; Rob Wilton (rwilton)
; opsawg ;
draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org
主题: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-07
From: Wubo (lana)
Sent: 03 September 2020 12:11
Hi Tom,
Many
From: Wubo (lana)
Sent: 03 September 2020 12:11
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for the review, will fix in the rev-09.
Or leave it and treat the comments as part of IETF Last Call (which I hope will
happen soon) - I am easy either way.
Tom Petch
Thanks,
Bo
-邮件原件-
发件人: tom petch [mailto:ie...
Hi Tom,
Many thanks for the review, will fix in the rev-09.
Thanks,
Bo
-邮件原件-
发件人: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com]
发送时间: 2020年9月3日 0:13
收件人: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; opsawg
; draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang@ietf.org
主题: Re: AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs-yang-07
Looking
Dear Opsa wg colleagues,
During the summer period that followed last IETF meeting people
several people had holidays, so there were no attendance to the LxNM calls.
Hence, it is time to retake now the LxNM calls (reminder every Thursday at
15:00 CEST). The invitation sent by Joe
Re-,
Sure.
Please expect the changes to be implemented -01.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Med
De : Dhruv Dhody [mailto:dhruv.i...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : jeudi 3 septembre 2020 11:09
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed TGI/OLN
Cc : opsawg
Objet : Re: Dhruv's comments (RE: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTION:
draft-bgbw-opsawg-v
Hi Med,
Thanks for considering my comments.
> - This text
> >
> >To avoid the issues discussed above, this document defines a common
> >YANG module that is meant to be reused by various VPN-related
> > modules
> >such as Layer 3 VPN Service Model (L3SM) [RFC8299], Layer 2 VPN
> >S
Hi Dhruv,
Thank you for the comments.
Please see inline.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Dhruv Dhody
> Envoyé : mercredi 26 août 2020 16:48
> À : Joe Clarke (jclarke)
> Cc : opsawg
> Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] CALL FOR ADOPTI
Hi Italo,
I'm afraid that "svc-common" is too generic and does not reflect what we are
planning to do in this draft: L2/L3 VPNs. I suggest we maintain the initial
scope and name.
Thank you.
Cheers,
Med
> -Message d'origine-
> De : OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] De la part
12 matches
Mail list logo
