Re: [OPSAWG] Manifest need? Re: draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest

A new idea just pop up. How to control the manifest data? Periodically, event? What if the telemetry data is event triggered, not period? Cheers, Tianran 发件人: Benoit Claise 发送时间: 2022年12月8日 0:56 收件人: Alexander Clemm ; Tianran Zhou ; opsawg@ietf.org 主题: Re: [OPSAWG] Manifest need? Re:

Re: [OPSAWG] Manifest need? Re: draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest

Hi Benoit, all, Looking forward to the clarifications / rationalizations in the draft, and feel free to reach out if you would like further feedback. I do think fleshing this out clearly is important so that we ensure to not unnecessarily introduce more complexity without tangible benefits.

Re: [OPSAWG] [netmod] How many "digital twins" every single network should have? Who would map between "twins"?

Hi Jan, Thanks for you your answer. Reading more I have found more evidence that the “digital network twin” should be single/unified for a network of any size: - I did mention below OpenConfig that had merged configuration and operational data models many years ago, - RFC8342 is asking for the

Re: [OPSAWG] [netmod] How many "digital twins" every single network should have? Who would map between "twins"?

Hi Eduard, > Hi Automation Gurus, > YANG modules may be treated like a “digital twin” of the network with > different resolution/accuracy (depending on Module details). > It looks like RFC 8969 is discussing that different YANG models (for > different layers or functions) of the same network

Re: [OPSAWG] Manifest need? Re: draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest

Hi Alex, On 11/28/2022 8:30 PM, Alexander Clemm wrote: I find this response confusing.  To me this reads that if a non-IETF telemetry feature is used, the data manifest would in fact be up to the implementation i.e. proprietary.  However, it would seem to me that to be useful, the

Re: [OPSAWG] Manifest need? Re: draft-claise-opsawg-collected-data-manifest

Hi Alex, Sorry for the delay in replying. You are right in the sense we don't define new piece of information. I stressed it on the first slide during the IETF 115 •Goal is not to expose new information via YANG but rather to define what needs to be kept as metadata (or Data Manifest)

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Dear OPSAWG, In the same lines, I just wanted to say that I implemented this draft in the open-source project Fd.io VPP (*) and found no issues. Alex (*) https://github.com/insa-unyte/vpp-srh-onpath-telemetry > On 5 Dec