Dear OPSAWG, In the same lines, I just wanted to say that I implemented this draft in the open-source project Fd.io <http://fd.io/> VPP (*) and found no issues.
Alex (*) https://github.com/insa-unyte/vpp-srh-onpath-telemetry <https://github.com/insa-unyte/vpp-srh-onpath-telemetry> > On 5 Dec 2022, at 20:26, Paolo Lucente <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > Speaking with my hat of software developer: I have implemented this in the > free open-source flow collector pmacct (*) as part of the IETF 115 hackathon > and found no issues. I hence support WGLC of the document. > > Paolo > > (*) https://github.com/pmacct/pmacct > > > On 30/11/22 10:53, Joe Clarke (jclarke) wrote: >> Hello, WG. As discussed at IETF 115, we want to conduct a WG LC for >> draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh. The authors believe this work is stable >> and moreover used the 115 hackathon to develop a interoperable >> implementations (linked in Data Tracker) . Additionally, IANA has already >> weighed in on this work and agree with the considerations approach. >> Therefore, we are calling for a two week LC. We will conclude on December >> 14. >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/ >> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/> >> Please review the current -04 draft, post your comments and/or your thoughts >> on the current text. >> Thanks. >> Joe >> _______________________________________________ >> OPSAWG mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
