[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh-05.txt

2022-12-15 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

2022-12-15 Thread Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Closing this WG LC out. A great deal of support has been expressed for this work, and the chairs appreciate the attention to not only IANA but working implementations. This draft will move forward to the IESG. However, we NEED a shepherd. I personally don’t feel comfortable shepherding this

Re: [OPSAWG] [netmod] How many "digital twins" every single network should have? Who would map between "twins"?

2022-12-15 Thread Qin Wu
Hi, Tom: Model driven technology has laid foundation for operators and service provides to build their Digital twin platform, one more concrete reference can be RFC8969, which not only looks into top down service fulfillment, but also Bottom up service assurance or performance monitoring, in my

Re: [OPSAWG] [netmod] How many "digital twins" every single network should have? Who would map between "twins"?

2022-12-15 Thread tom petch
From: netmod on behalf of Qin Wu Sent: 15 December 2022 08:07 Hi, Eduard: Thank for bring this issue up, I think digital twins is more related to network topology model, network monitoring model rather than LxSM service delivery model or LxNM network model I was going to ask for an

Re: [OPSAWG] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-12-15 Thread tom petch
Bad practice for an uninvolved person to jump into an IESG discussion so dropping the IESG... Picking up on Éric Vyncke's comment about hurting his 'SQL eyes', I am surprised it is only his eyes. It hurts me too! The use of one integer in an integer range to mean something semantically

Re: [OPSAWG] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with COMMENT)

2022-12-15 Thread Benoit Claise
Hi Paul, Thanks for your review. On 12/15/2022 1:01 AM, Paul Wouters via Datatracker wrote: Paul Wouters has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email

Re: [OPSAWG] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-12-15 Thread Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
Thank you Michal -éric From: "mva...@cesnet.cz" Date: Thursday, 15 December 2022 at 08:42 To: Jean Quilbeuf , Eric Vyncke , The IESG , Cc: "draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-y...@ietf.org" , "opsawg-cha...@ietf.org" , "opsawg@ietf.org" , "m...@sandelman.ca" , "tpa...@apple.com" Subject:

[OPSAWG] Murray Kucherawy's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2022-12-15 Thread Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker
Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Re: [OPSAWG] [netmod] How many "digital twins" every single network should have? Who would map between "twins"?

2022-12-15 Thread Qin Wu
Hi, Eduard: Thank for bring this issue up, I think digital twins is more related to network topology model, network monitoring model rather than LxSM service delivery model or LxNM network model First, As described in RFC8969 or RFC8309, LxSM service delivery model or LxNM network model