[OPSAWG] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-12

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar Review result: Ready I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more

Re: [OPSAWG] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Benoit! Thanks for the explanations below and the revised draft to address my telechat review. I've cleared my position on the document. Roman > -Original Message- > From: Benoit Claise > Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 1:12 PM > To: Jean Quilbeuf ; Roman > Danyliw ; The IESG >

Re: [OPSAWG] Paul Wouters' No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with COMMENT)

Hi Paul, Your comments should be addressed in the published version: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-11 Best, Jean > -Original Message- > From: Paul Wouters via Datatracker [mailto:nore...@ietf.org] > Sent: Thursday 15 December 2022

Re: [OPSAWG] Éric Vyncke's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Eric, Thanks again for your comments, I tried to address them, the diff is here: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-11 Best and happy new year ! Jean > -Original Message- > From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) [mailto:evyn...@cisco.com] >

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-yang-11.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : YANG Modules for Service Assurance Authors : Benoit Claise

Re: [OPSAWG] Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Lars, Thanks for your review. We addressed all your comments in the newly posted version v13. Regards, Benoit On 12/12/2022 12:55 PM, Lars Eggert via Datatracker wrote: Lars Eggert has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: No

Re: [OPSAWG] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Eric, Thanks for your review. We addressed all your comments in the newly posted version v13. Regards, Benoit On 12/12/2022 6:22 PM, Éric Vyncke via Datatracker wrote: Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: No

Re: [OPSAWG] Secdir telechat review of draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12

Thanks Christian. Regards, Benoit On 12/20/2022 8:01 PM, Christian Huitema via Datatracker wrote: Reviewer: Christian Huitema Review result: Ready My review of version 11 of this draft was making a number of suggestions. These suggestions have largely been addressed in the version 12 of the

Re: [OPSAWG] Roman Danyliw's Discuss on draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Roman, The new IETF draft version v13 has been posted with the changes discussed below. Thanks for your review. Regards, Benoit On 12/15/2022 2:14 AM, Jean Quilbeuf wrote: Hi Roman, Thanks for your review, You will find our answer below. Best, Jean -Original Message- From:

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-service-assurance-architecture-13.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group WG of the IETF. Title : Service Assurance for Intent-based Networking Architecture Authors : Benoit

Re: [OPSAWG] [ippm] 回复: FW: WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

Dear Zhenqiang, Thanks a lot for your feedback. I presume with gRPC you are referring to YANG push (RFC 8639, RFC 8641, draft-ietf-netconf-udp-notif, draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif). gNMI (gRPC is the transport of gNMI) has been proposed (draft-openconfig-rtgwg-gnmi-spec) in 2018 but not

Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

Dear Zhenqiang, Thanks a lot for your feedback. I presume with gRPC you are referring to YANG push (RFC 8639, RFC 8641, draft-ietf-netconf-udp-notif, draft-ietf-netconf-https-notif). gNMI (gRPC is the transport of gNMI) has been proposed (draft-openconfig-rtgwg-gnmi-spec) in 2018 but not

[OPSAWG] 回复: [ippm] FW: WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

Hi Tianran and all, Why not use one protocol, such as grpc, to export all the iOAM metrics? It is ok to export one way delay in IPFIX. If other metrics, such as queue depth, buffer occupancy, etc, have to be exported in grpc, it is not necessory to export one way delay in IPFIX. Best

Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-tgraf-opsawg-ipfix-on-path-telemetry-01

Hello all, Why not use the grpc to export all the iOAM metrics measured by the device? Only one way delay is expoeted by IPFIX in this doc, how about others? I prefer using one protocol to export all the iOAM metrics if possible because this is convinent for both the device and the collector.

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-add-encrypted-dns-07

Hi Rob, Thanks for the review. Candidate changes to address this review can be tracked at: https://tinyurl.com/opsawg-add-latest Please find inline some inputs in addition to the replies from Alan. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Rob Wilton (rwilton) > Envoyé : lundi 19

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-09

Hi Tom, all, We already have the following in the Introduction: A network may support multiple services, potentially of different types. Whether a SAP topology is dedicated to services of a specific service type, an individual service, or shared among many services of different