> Absent implementation of the geofeed: attribute in a particular IRR
> database
>
> if so, it was intentional. perhaps s/IRR/Whois/?
>
> JMC: Yep. I see what you’re saying now. I was reading as RIR. I
> think IRR is fine, but perhaps it should be expanded like you do RIR
> earlier.
Absent implementation of the geofeed: attribute in a particular IRR
database
if so, it was intentional. perhaps s/IRR/Whois/?
JMC: Yep. I see what you’re saying now. I was reading as RIR. I think IRR is
fine, but perhaps it should be expanded like you do RIR earlier.
> My biggest
> I’ve read the original draft and the diff mentioned below.
thanks. reviews are hard to find these days.
> I think you’ve misspelled RIR as IRR in the diff.
do you mean
Absent implementation of the geofeed: attribute in a particular IRR
database
if so, it was intentional. perhaps