Re: [OPSAWG] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-04

2024-01-24 Thread Martin Björklund
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > Hi Martin, > > Thanks for the review. > > FWIW, a new version that fixes the nit you reported and other minor pending > we had is available online: > https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-05 That was quick!

Re: [OPSAWG] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-04

2024-01-24 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Martin, Thanks for the review. FWIW, a new version that fixes the nit you reported and other minor pending we had is available online: https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-05 Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Martin Björklund via

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-05.txt

2024-01-24 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-05.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. Title: A YANG Data Model for Augmenting VPN Service and Network Models with Attachment Circuits Authors: Mohamed

[OPSAWG] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-04

2024-01-24 Thread Martin Björklund via Datatracker
Reviewer: Martin Björklund Review result: Ready with Issues Here is my YANG doctor's review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit-04. o There are several typedefs defined on the form: typedef attachment-circuit-reference { type leafref { path

[OPSAWG] Yangdoctors early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue-04

2024-01-24 Thread Martin Björklund via Datatracker
Reviewer: Martin Björklund Review result: Ready with Nits This is a very short, and from a YANG-perspective simple, module. It looks good, and I also found one nit: s/provisionned/provisioned/g /martin ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-opsawg-evans-discardmodel-02

2024-01-24 Thread Evans, John
Hi Benoit, Thanks for your feedback. > I mean: what is the value of an information model without a respective > data model, or a mapping to data model(s)? Whilst it's true that having a data model is essential for implementing an information model effectively, our focus is on standardising a

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-opsawg-evans-discardmodel-02

2024-01-24 Thread Benoit Claise
Dear all, See in-line. On 1/17/2024 12:51 PM, Henk Birkholz wrote: Dear OPSAWG members, this email starts a call for Working Group Adoption of https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-opsawg-evans-discardmodel-02.html ending on Wednesday, January 31st. As a reminder, this I-D describes an

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-opsawg-evans-discardmodel-02

2024-01-24 Thread Tianran Zhou
Hi Authors, I read this draft and I think this work is valuable. There are several comments for your consideration. 1. We have YANG as the modeling language for configuration DM. For this draft, do you have any formal language for the IM? While I think the tree diagram is also clear, I am

Re: [OPSAWG] [**EXTERNAL**] RE: [IPFIX] WG LC: IPFIX documents

2024-01-24 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Paul, Thanks for the follow-up. Much appreciated. Please see inline. Cheers, Med De : Aitken, Paul Envoyé : mardi 23 janvier 2024 18:25 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET ; Joe Clarke (jclarke) ; opsawg@ietf.org Cc : t...@ietf.org; ts...@ietf.org; 6...@ietf.org; ip...@ietf.org Objet : Re: