Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh

2024-04-15 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Mahesh, Please see inline. Cheers, Med Orange Restricted De : Mahesh Jethanandani Envoyé : lundi 15 avril 2024 22:47 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; pait...@ciena.com Objet : Re: AD review of

[OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-07.txt

2024-04-15 Thread internet-drafts
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-07.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Operations and Management Area Working Group (OPSAWG) WG of the IETF. Title: Simple Fixes to the IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) IANA Registry Authors: Mohamed Boucadair Benoit

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes

2024-04-15 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Mahesh, Thank you for the follow-up. Will proceed with the submission of the new version. Please see inline. Cheers, Med De : Mahesh Jethanandani Envoyé : lundi 15 avril 2024 21:05 À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fi...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org Objet : Re: AD

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

2024-04-15 Thread Carlos Pignataro
Greg,Repeating something does not make it so…You had argued that those were definitions only within the context of DetNet, and each context can have different ones. You really cannot have it both ways. This is confusing. I-Ds follow causality — lots of things were approved to then be corrected. 

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

2024-04-15 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Michael, thank you for the update. I'm glad that you found the definition in RFC 9551 working for ANIMA's Autonomic Control Plane as well. I will read RFC 8994 to educate myself about it. Regards, Greg On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 5:54 PM Michael Richardson wrote: > > Greg Mirsky wrote: > >

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh

2024-04-15 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
Hi Med, Thanks for addressing most of the comments. Two follow-up comments. See below with [mj] > On Apr 15, 2024, at 4:51 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > > Hi Mahesh, > > Thank you for the review. > > The changes can be tracked at: Diff: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh.txt -

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes

2024-04-15 Thread Mahesh Jethanandani
Hi Med, Thanks for addressing most of the comments. One comment and one clarification. This might be the iddiff tool, but in the diff file you shared I see the following under the title of the draft: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-latest I was expecting to see a number, not the word latest.

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

2024-04-15 Thread Michael Richardson
Greg Mirsky wrote: > I have to repeat that the definitions of terms "in-band OAM", "out-of-band > OAM", and "on-path telemetry" > In-band OAM: an active OAM method that is in band within the > monitored DetNet OAM domain when it traverses the same set of > links and

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

2024-04-15 Thread Greg Mirsky
Hi Carlos, I have to repeat that the definitions of terms "in-band OAM", "out-of-band OAM", and "on-path telemetry" In-band OAM: an active OAM method that is in band within the monitored DetNet OAM domain when it traverses the same set of links and interfaces receiving the same QoS

Re: [OPSAWG]  WG Adoption Call for draft-pignataro-opsawg-oam-whaaat-question-mark-03

2024-04-15 Thread Carlos Pignataro
Dear Greg, Thank you for the input. It appears that much of what you write below was already discussed at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/IVQzSSU_kvGgopCyCp-8oqK_xmg/ Am I to understand you might be keen on continuing using "in-band OAM" with different meanings depending on the WG

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh

2024-04-15 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Mahesh, Thank you for the review. The changes can be tracked at: Diff: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-tcpo-v6eh.txt -

Re: [OPSAWG] AD review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes

2024-04-15 Thread mohamed . boucadair
Hi Mahesh, Thank you for the review. The candidate version to address your review can be seen at: Diff: draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes.txt -