I don't see any conflict with l2tpext wg work.
-Ignacio
At 07:43 8/19/2013, Ted Lemon wrote:
I've taken on the conflict review for draft-pfaff-ovsdb-proto-02, which is
proposed for publication in the independent stream. I think this document
does not conflict with the work that you are doing,
This draft seems to be about a pretty generic tabular database remote
interface. I didn't read it super closely but it seems to so general
as to have almost no binding with what open switch is about, although
I'm sure with the right tables having the right rows and columns, you
can indeed control
I agree -- I see no conflict with l2tpext work.
-- Carlos.
On Aug 19, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Ignacio Goyret i.goy...@alcatel-lucent.com
wrote:
I don't see any conflict with l2tpext wg work.
-Ignacio
At 07:43 8/19/2013, Ted Lemon wrote:
I've taken on the conflict review for
