ehave as if it had received
TAC_PLUS_AUTHOR_STATUS_FAIL.." (Section 9.5)
Best Regards!
-Michael
----
[OPSAWG] TACACS+ IMPLEMENTORS: Does your implementation match
On Aug 13, 2018, at 3:19 PM, Joe Clarke
wrote:
> As this document progresses towards ratification, the opsawg chairs are
> soliciting people that have implemented TACACS+ clients and/or servers
> to read the draft and comment as to whether or not their implementation
> is known to be compliant
As you know, draft-ietf-opsawg-tacacs is working to describe the TACACS+
protocol as it is known to be implemented today. This draft will become
an informational document and help inform subsequent works.
As this document progresses towards ratification, the opsawg chairs are
soliciting people
