25日 00:33
Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-00
Hi Xiao, All,
We have just uploaded the new revision of draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark and
we added some text to clarify the point you raised about the LAG interface.
Regards,
Giuseppe
From: xiao.m...@zte.com.cn
Sent
-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-m...@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org; i...@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-00
Got it. Thank you Thomas!
If some text can be added to clarify this usage of
ingressInterface/egressInterface and
ingressPhysicalInterface/egressPhysicalInterface
-ipfix-alt-m...@ietf.org
;opsawg@ietf.org
;i...@ietf.org ;
Date: 2024年04月03日 11:41
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-00
Dear Xiao,
Correct. Obviously this will be exported per flow and the interface entities
have to be key fields as the flow entities as well.
Best
different
values, is that right?
Cheers,
Xiao Min
Original
From: thomas.g...@swisscom.com
To: 肖敏10093570;draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-m...@ietf.org
;
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org ;'i...@ietf.org <'i...@ietf.org>;
Date: 2024年04月02日 19:32
Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-00
Dear Xi
OPSAWG On Behalf Of xiao.m...@zte.com.cn
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 10:58 AM
To: draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-m...@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; 'i...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-00
Be aware: This is an external email.
Hi authors,
At the request of Gi
Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2024 10:58 AM
To: draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-m...@ietf.org
Cc: opsawg@ietf.org; 'i...@ietf.org
Subject: [OPSAWG] draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-00
Be aware: This is an external email.
Hi authors,
At the request of Giuseppe, I had a read on draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt
Hi authors,
At the request of Giuseppe, I had a read on draft-gfz-opsawg-ipfix-alt-mark-00.
There are IPFIX IEs ingressInterface, egressInterface, ingressPhysicalInterface
and egressPhysicalInterface, is there an IE indicating a LAG interface?
Best Regards,
Xiao
