Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-22 Thread Benoit Claise
Hi Tim, I raised the question in my ops-dir review on whether it was OK for a Standards Track document (draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang) to include definitions for an Experimental Track mechanism (NPT66). I don't personally have a strong view either way, but felt obliged to point out the

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-22 Thread Tim Chown
raft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang? >>> >>> My preference would be a WG document for the reasons you state, but let >>> me check with Warren and Ignas. >>> >>> Joe >>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Med >>>> >>>>&

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-21 Thread Warren Kumari
ocument for the reasons you state, but let >> me check with Warren and Ignas. >> >> Joe >> >>> Cheers, >>> Med >>> >>>> -----Message d'origine- >>>> De : Joe Clarke [mailto:jcla...@cisco.com] >>>> Envoyé : mar

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-21 Thread Benoit Claise
-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org Objet : Re: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10 On 2/6/18 05:48, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: Re-, Either ways are easy to handle. I do a have a preference (dedicated informative section). I will wait

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-13 Thread t.petch
> > -Message d'origine- > > De : t.petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com] > > Envoyé : mercredi 7 février 2018 17:48 > > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN > > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org > > Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of dra

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-07 Thread t.petch
février 2018 13:01 > > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN > > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org > > Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10 > > > > While you are at it, you might like t

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-07 Thread Joe Clarke
Cheers, > Med > >> -Message d'origine- >> De : Joe Clarke [mailto:jcla...@cisco.com] >> Envoyé : mardi 6 février 2018 17:59 >> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN; Tim Chown >> Cc : ops-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang....@ietf.org; >> opsawg@ie

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-07 Thread mohamed.boucadair
etf.org > Objet : Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10 > > While you are at it, you might like to note > > s1.1 > / A NAPT my use /A NAPT may use / [Med] Fixed. > > feature siit { > description > .. >The trans

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-07 Thread t.petch
isc.ac.uk> Cc: <ops-...@ietf.org>; <draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang....@ietf.org>; <opsawg@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2018 8:14 AM Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10 > Hi Joe, all, > > Thanks. Lets' then go tha

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-07 Thread mohamed.boucadair
t; opsawg@ietf.org > Objet : Re: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10 > > On 2/6/18 05:48, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > > Re-, > > > > Either ways are easy to handle. I do a have a preference (dedicated > informative section). > > >

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-06 Thread Joe Clarke
 : mardi 6 février 2018 11:17 >> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN >> Cc : ops-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang....@ietf.org; >> opsawg@ietf.org >> Objet : Re: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10 >> >> Hi, >> >>> On 6 Feb 2

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-06 Thread mohamed.boucadair
ad...@orange.com] > Envoyé : mardi 6 février 2018 11:49 > À : Tim Chown > Cc : ops-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang@ietf.org; > opsawg@ietf.org > Objet : RE: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10 > > Re-, > > Either ways are easy to handle. I do a

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-06 Thread mohamed.boucadair
6 février 2018 11:17 > À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN > Cc : ops-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang@ietf.org; > opsawg@ietf.org > Objet : Re: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10 > > Hi, > > > On 6 Feb 2018, at 10:13, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wr

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-06 Thread Tim Chown
>> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN >> Cc : ops-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang@ietf.org; >> opsawg@ietf.org >> Objet : Re: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10 >> >> Hi Med, >> >>> On 6 Feb 2018, at 09:02, mohamed.boucad...@

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-06 Thread mohamed.boucadair
et : Re: Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10 > > Hi Med, > > > On 6 Feb 2018, at 09:02, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > > > > Hi Tim, > > > > Thank you for the review. > > > > Please see inline. > > > > Che

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-06 Thread Tim Chown
Hi Med, > On 6 Feb 2018, at 09:02, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: > > Hi Tim, > > Thank you for the review. > > Please see inline. > > Cheers, > Med > >> -Message d'origine- >> De : Tim Chown [mailto:tim.ch...@jisc.ac.uk] >> Envoyé : lundi 5 février 2018 20:07 >> À :

Re: [OPSAWG] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang-10

2018-02-06 Thread mohamed.boucadair
Hi Tim, Thank you for the review. Please see inline. Cheers, Med > -Message d'origine- > De : Tim Chown [mailto:tim.ch...@jisc.ac.uk] > Envoyé : lundi 5 février 2018 20:07 > À : ops-...@ietf.org > Cc : draft-ietf-opsawg-nat-yang@ietf.org; opsawg@ietf.org > Objet : Opsdir early