-邮件原件-
发件人: Evans, John [mailto:jevanamz=40amazon.co...@dmarc.ietf.org]
发送时间: 2024年1月31日 20:25
收件人: Qin Wu ; Evans, John ; Henk
Birkholz ; OPSAWG
主题: Re: [OPSAWG] WG Adoption Call for draft-opsawg-evans-discardmodel-02
Hi Qin,
> [Qin Wu] Maybe a new section can be added to clarify
Hi,
I have read the latest version of this draft and have the following comments:
1. what is the difference between packet loss and packet discard, it seems this
two terms are used interchangeably in the draft, in some places packet discard
reporting is used, while in some other places, packet
Hi Qin,
Thank you for your feedback.
> 1. what is the difference between packet loss and packet discard, it seems
> this two terms are used interchangeably in the draft, in some places
> packet discard reporting is used, while in some other places, packet loss
> reporting, which I think lack
Hi, John:
> I am wondering whether this draft should update [RFC8343] to address such
> limitation.
Ultimately, I think we should update the corresponding data models to reflect
whatever we agree in this draft, should we progress it. In this specific case,
RFC8343 has reflected what is in
Hi Qin,
> [Qin Wu] Maybe a new section can be added to clarify the relation with
> RFC8343.
We will explicitly call out the relationship to data models.
> the table in section 3 just provides model structure but doesn't specify
> parameters details.
Yes - agreed - we will expand on that
>
Henk Birkholz has requested publication of
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls-09 as Proposed Standard on behalf of the
OPSAWG working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-acceptable-urls/
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote:
> Hmm...I remember at least the following candidates changes from that
> thread, e.g.,
> *
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/opsawg/u0__66zIpCMHA4syzt8fWtyx98Y/
> *
>
On 31.01.2024 15:10, Michael Richardson wrote:
I don't know if ISE documents can create registries: one ISE told me no.
See RFC 8726. DR not permitted unless it's a required sub-registry
tied to a requested allocation.
Eliot
OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public
