Paul Wouters via Datatracker wrote:
> I unfortunately find this document very hard to understand. Overall, I
think it
> would do better to split out the use cases. It seems to conflate or mix
three
> distinct use cases: 1) A CPE with firewall+MUD-controller and an IoT MUD
>
Hi WG,
We only have 1.5 hours joint with OPS area this time. So our agenda is very
packed.
We adjust and post the final agenda:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-119-opsawg/
The speakers please control your time and please send over your slides to the
chairs two days before the meeting.
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-iot-dns-considerations-12: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph,
Hi Tianran,
thank you for feedback and your hint.
We will address this also to IPPM.
In case the WG has interest, send us feedback please.
We would appreciate an alternative presentation opportunity in this WG, too.
There is also a public side meeting regarding this topic.
In case somebody of
