r STD5/ICMP lies, but possibly
someone that know could forward.
And I think it would be a good idea to call on Scott to coordinate a
response.
/Loa
> id="lineBreakAtBeginningOfSignature">Sent from my
iPhoneBegin forwarded
> message:From:
> Greg Mirsky gregimir...@gmail.comD
Greg,
I'm not the expert on ICMP, but as far as I see you are correct.
I very much would like an ICMP expert to look at this, but I don't know
who to contact. Can anyone help me?
/Loa
> Hi Loa,
> thank you for bringing to the discussion this liaison. I've looked through
> the p
ould we ask that the directorates put an instruction for
the directorate reviewers to try to capture this?
The rest of the document seems fine to me.
/Loa
> Hi Adrian,
> thank you for your kind consideration of my notes. Please find my follow-up
> notes below tagged by GIM>>.
>
the document - after
all you are co-author; but please note that the IETF consensus
process does not work by voting. And maybe a pointer to the
Tao of IETF.
/Loa
On 2013-09-10 13:39, Melinda Shore wrote:
On 9/10/2013 3:29 AM, Loa Andersson wrote:
Melinda,
in general I agree with you - but I
a funny hat...
do I read this right if I understand it like this
- small things I give one or more cookies
- big big things, I wear a funny hat when I give you the cookies
right?
/Loa
PS
Remember that we have runnig cookie code, ask ekr :)
W
Could you please send a private message to me :-
is created it is easy to distinguish from existing once.It is also a heads up to wg chairs that there is documents where this should be considered. /LoaSent from my iPadOn 14 Dec 2023, at 23:10, Italo Busi wrote:
Loa, Greg,
I am not sure we really need abbreviations for in-band and out
shable from the existing.
If we say that the IOAM for In-situ OAM exists, we should not consider iOAM or
oOAM as abbreviations for whatever meaning.
/Loa
>
> Stewart
> ___
> mpls mailing list
> m...@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/
this a more general guidance than just to refer
to RFC 9197.
I also think we should make "OAM" well-known, so we don't have to expand
it when we use e.g. "In situ OAM" in a title.
Other than that I support adopting the draft as a working group draft.
/Loa
--
Loa Ande
