Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
Hi there, [Copying GROW WG as this might be relevant to their coverage areas] The document seems to be a good start but covers only standard communities. This is not sufficient given the universal deployment of 4 octet ASNs. Both extended communities [RFC4360] and large communities [RFC8092] are needed and are used to address the signalling requirements for AS4 ASNs. Having separate documents each addressing only a specific type of community does not seem practical and rational. The document should include the definitions for IEs covering extended and large communities. What is the logic of selecting multiple communities for export that a prefix may have been decorated with? Is it all of them all the time? The upper limit may be reaching 16000 standard communities per prefix - would that fit into resulting IPFIX IE? If there is a limit, how does it work? Is there any interpretation done on the values of the communities (all types, not just standard ones)? Those all are operational considerations aspects and should be covered in the document, appendix A likely could be a good place for it. Security considerations on the privacy aspects would to be covered. Ignas On 13/02/2017 03:36, Tianran Zhou wrote: Dear OPSAWG, In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE extension draft. By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by Feb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the extension described in the document. Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course). Regards, Tianran ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
Hi, all BGP community information plays an important role nowadays. After reading this draft, I think the information element provided can solve some problems to some degree. I support for the work group document adoption. Cheers Yu -Original Message- From: opsawg-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AM To: opsawg@ietf.org Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 Dear OPSAWG, In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE extension draft. By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by Feb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the extension described in the document. Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course). Regards, Tianran ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
Hi, all I support the adoption. Extension to IPFIX information model to carry the BGP community information is helpful. Best Regards Zongpeng Du -Original Message- From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran Zhou Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AM To: opsawg@ietf.org Cc: opsawg-cha...@ietf.org Subject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 Dear OPSAWG, In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE extension draft. By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by Feb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the extension described in the document. Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course). Regards, Tianran ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
Re: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
Hi,ALL I think the extension of IPFIX is valuable in carrying the BGP community information. I support for the adoption. Regards. Fangwei ＞[OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 ＞Tianran Zhou ＜zhoutian...@huawei.com＞ Mon, 13 February 2017 03:35 UTCShow header ＞Dear OPSAWG, ＞In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE extension draft. ＞By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in ＞OPSAWG. ＞Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) ＞https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 ＞The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by Feb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the extension ＞described in the document. ＞Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with ＞explanation of course). Regards, Tianran___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
[OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
Dear all. I think the extension of IPFIX is valuable in carrying the BGP community information. Personally I agree on the adoption as a work group document. Regards. Fangwei Dear IPFIX, Since the IPFIX WG is concluded, this IE extension draft is processed now in OPSAWG.Thanks very much for the previous comments and discussions on this draft in this mailing list.Now the OPSAWG is polling for adoption of this I-D. I sincerely appreciate your opinion and review.Best Regards,Tianran Zhou-Original Message-From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tianran ZhouSent: Monday, February 13, 2017 11:37 AMTo: opsawg@ietf.orgCc: opsawg-chairs@ietf.orgSubject: [OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02Dear OPSAWG,In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE extension draft.By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG.Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by Feb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the extension described in the document.Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course).Regards,Tianran___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
[OPSAWG] WG adoption poll for draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02
Dear OPSAWG, In Seoul, we got enough interest and positive response on this IPFIX IE extension draft. By the authors' request, this email starts a formal poll. The chairs would like to know if the WG participants agree that the following document should be adopted as a WG document in OPSAWG. Export BGP community information in IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX) https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-opsawg-ipfix-bgp-community-02 The adoption poll will take two weeks. Please let us know your opinion by Feb 27. It would also be good to hear who is willing to review and/or implement or deploy the extension described in the document. Since we already found that the majority of the f2f participants at our IETF97 session like this idea, please do speak up now if you do not agree or have serious objections (with explanation of course). Regards, Tianran ___ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
