When I enter some new instructions into e.g. the torrc config file:
Are these keywords and their values case-sensitive or not?
In other words is there a difference between
exitnodes {us}
and
ExitNodes {US}
Ben
On 08/12/2009 11:02 AM, Ben Stover wrote:
When I enter some new instructions into e.g. the torrc config file:
Are these keywords and their values case-sensitive or not?
Yes they are case sensitive.
--
Andrew Lewman
The Tor Project
pgp 0x31B0974B
Website: https://torproject.org/
Blog:
On 08/09/2009 04:00 PM, Flamsmark wrote:
Most of these behaviors are scriptable without difficulty by editing the
torrc and sending Tor a sighup.
The better way to do this may be via the control port and SETCONF commands.
--
Andrew Lewman
The Tor Project
pgp 0x31B0974B
Website:
That's totally possible too. However, my point there was that those
behaviors are the easy part. The question is how to stop relaying for a
short period without ending your 'uptime'.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:05, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org wrote:
On 08/09/2009 04:00 PM, Flamsmark
Hi,
I wanted to get tor for use on IRC, but it seems prohibitively
difficult to set up. And I'm a programmer!
There's this tor browser bundle that I guess is supposed to make it
super easy to use, except I already have firefox, I don't want to
download another copy of firefox and set that all
On 08/12/2009 09:43 PM, Peter wrote:
There's this tor browser bundle that I guess is supposed to make it
super easy to use, except I already have firefox, I don't want to
download another copy of firefox and set that all up. �Then there's a
torbutton on the firefox plugins page, but that's
You're kidding me right. A VM? Why not just a windows kernel driver?
Look at torvm, https://torproject.org/torvm. It's still alpha-ware, but
essentially does just what you want. You mentioned you were a
programmer, join us in improving TorVM.
I'd like a pony, too.
--
Andrew Lewman
Why not just a Windows kernel driver? Because it hasn't been written yet.
You're welcome to help write a kernel driver, or a VPN host or whatever else
you think is the next logical step to improving Tor. However, remember the
version number: 0.2.1.*. Tor is not a 'finished' piece of software. It
Heh, well, I tell you what. You send me a hundred thousand dollars,
and after the check clears I'll write you a great windows kernel
driver. Otherwise, I'm broke, my life is a living hell, and I already
have several projects I work on out of the goodness of my heart, so,
I'm sorry.
Thanks and
Then perhaps complaining about the direction of the work that many others
have done pro bono is a little premature, no?
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 01:18, Peter necedema...@gmail.com wrote:
Heh, well, I tell you what. You send me a hundred thousand dollars,
and after the check clears I'll write
I'm not complaining about it, I'm just saying, if you want widespread
adoption, a kernel driver is the way to go. And moreover, a kernel
driver is easier to write and support than a VM.
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 1:21 AM, Flamsmarkflamsm...@gmail.com wrote:
Then perhaps complaining about the
'Widespread adoption' is not the current sort-term aim. While we all think
that fast, universal, anonymous internet access would be a good thing, we
simply can't support that right now. The volunteer network of relays isn't
that big. Even now, Tor has trouble dealing with the network load. If Tor
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:23 PM, Peternecedema...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not complaining about it, I'm just saying, if you want widespread
adoption, a kernel driver is the way to go. And moreover, a kernel
driver is easier to write and support than a VM.
hi Peter,
there are various reasons
On 08/11/2009 08:51 AM, Kai-Uwe wrote:
if this not the correct list to report above issue please appologies and
a mild hint where to report would be welcome.
You should file a bug report at https://bugs.torproject.org.
After the update to FF3.5.2 and the mozilla.com torbutton add-on its
14 matches
Mail list logo
