On 2/4/2011 6:15 PM, Curious Kid wrote:
You seem to have the misconception that Tor only uses one circuit at any given
time, ...
Tor builds several circuits that you can use at any given time. I think three is
default...
I understood there were several circuits for nodes in the middle, but
d
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:52:25 +
"Geoff Down" wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:21 -0500, "Aplin, Justin M"
> wrote:
> > On 2/3/2011 8:28 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> > > I am using Torbutton. It is supposed to Torrify Firefox - yes?
> >
> > In a roundabout way, yes. Torbutton forwards Firefox tr
>Why, after getting all new nodes & especially new exit node IP address (I
>confirmed was a new address), would Tor send an old IP address (? from
>memory) to the site? Doesn't make sense. If Tor WAS sending an old
>address
>
>
>(to any site) after getting new exit address,
On Friday 04 February 2011 16:10:13 Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> So how does that relate to Tor? Do sites using this see Tor as a
> robot? I didn't even get on the site. Plus, there're no files to d/l
> from it - at least not from an avg users capability.
Probably the web server saw so many accesses fr
On 2/4/2011 2:42 PM, cmeclax-sazri wrote:
robots.txt is a file put on some websites as a directive to robots. If
you run
a wiki, and you want only current versions, not the hundreds of previous
versions of every page, indexed, you could put a directive in robots.txt, or
label the pages themselve
On Friday 04 February 2011 13:38:14 Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> No ideas yet on what "automated software that doesn't follow /robots.txt
> is forbidden," means?
robots.txt is a file put on some websites as a directive to robots. If you run
a wiki, and you want only current versions, not the hundreds of
On 2/4/2011 9:43 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
This just in! I discovered Polipo wasn't configured to start w/ Tor,
as of today. Don't know what happened. When install the bundle,
usually sets up Polipo up automatically (did in past Vidalia bundle
vers.). So, set it up thru Vidalia UI "Setting
On 2/4/2011 8:52 AM, Geoff Down wrote:
I understood that Firefox couldn't be trusted to not leak DNS requests,
hence the need for an HTTP proxy like Polipo. I'm running an old
version of Firefox though - are the newer ones fixed in this regard?
GD
Good point. Don't know if Fx is fixed on t
On 2/3/2011 10:23 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:21:34 -0500
"Aplin, Justin M" wrote:
On 2/3/2011 8:28 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
I am using Torbutton. It is supposed to Torrify Firefox - yes?
In a roundabout way, yes. Torbutton forwards Firefox traffic to Polipo,
which in turn
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:21 -0500, "Aplin, Justin M"
wrote:
> On 2/3/2011 8:28 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> > I am using Torbutton. It is supposed to Torrify Firefox - yes?
>
> In a roundabout way, yes. Torbutton forwards Firefox traffic to Polipo,
> which in turn sends the traffic to the SOCKS por
On 2/3/2011 10:23 PM, Robert Ransom wrote:
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:21:34 -0500
"Aplin, Justin M" wrote:
On 2/3/2011 8:28 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
I am using Torbutton. It is supposed to Torrify Firefox - yes?
In a roundabout way, yes. Torbutton forwards Firefox traffic to Polipo,
which in turn
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 22:21:34 -0500
"Aplin, Justin M" wrote:
> On 2/3/2011 8:28 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> > I am using Torbutton. It is supposed to Torrify Firefox - yes?
>
> In a roundabout way, yes. Torbutton forwards Firefox traffic to Polipo,
> which in turn sends the traffic to the SOCKS po
On 2/3/2011 8:28 PM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
I am using Torbutton. It is supposed to Torrify Firefox - yes?
In a roundabout way, yes. Torbutton forwards Firefox traffic to Polipo,
which in turn sends the traffic to the SOCKS port of Tor. Disabling
Torbutton and entering the Tor SOCKS information
The 2nd option of Torbutton under Prefs>Security>Cache, "Block disk and
memory cache access during Tor," may be the answer.
see http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.cache.memory.enable
Don't know what would have to do to clear mem cache from Fx activity -
shut down computer? (assuming memory cac
On 2/3/2011 5:09 PM, Aplin, Justin M wrote:
On 2/3/2011 5:53 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
...
Neither could I. It may be entirely in memory. Nevertheless that was the
conclusion I came to. It's not the IP address being cached, it's the
response from the site I would say. Your new request is never bei
On 2/3/2011 5:53 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
...
Neither could I. It may be entirely in memory. Nevertheless that was the
conclusion I came to. It's not the IP address being cached, it's the
response from the site I would say. Your new request is never being sent
(via your new IP) because Polipo is ret
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 15:30 -0600, "Joe Btfsplk"
wrote:
> On 2/2/2011 5:54 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
> > I came to the conclusion that it
> > was Polipo cacheing. You can try inserting a 'Pragma: No-cache' header
> > using Modify Headers or a similar addon, though that does make you stand
> > out.
>
On 2/2/2011 5:54 PM, Geoff Down wrote:
I came to the conclusion that it
was Polipo cacheing. You can try inserting a 'Pragma: No-cache' header
using Modify Headers or a similar addon, though that does make you stand
out.
Not sure what you mean by "pragma: No-cache" header. How to go about
i
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 16:27 -0600, "Joe Btfsplk"
wrote:
> Using latest stable Vidalia / Tor bundle for Win (Vista x64).
>
> Never really had this prob before installing latest ver, but could be
> coincidence. When using Tor/ Torbutton, only one site gave message (to
> the effect) "the IP addre
Using latest stable Vidalia / Tor bundle for Win (Vista x64).
Never really had this prob before installing latest ver, but could be
coincidence. When using Tor/ Torbutton, only one site gave message (to
the effect) "the IP address you're using has been determined to be
abusing this site ? / s
20 matches
Mail list logo
