-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Erwin Lam wrote:
Nov 23 05:07:29.317 [notice] Tor 0.2.1.20 opening log file.
Nov 23 05:07:29.352 [notice] Parsing GEOIP file.
Nov 23 05:07:30.212 [notice] No current certificate known for authority
urras; launching request.
Nov 23 05:07:30.212
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I should correct myself: I'm supposed to be in a safe network, yet the
errors are still on.
Could it be related to the openssl version? The 0.9.8k release disables
SSL renegotiation.
- --
Marco Bonetti
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer:
On Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:21:41 +0100 Erwin Lam erwin...@dds.nl wrote:
On Monday 23 November 2009 03:29:14 Scott Bennett wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:47:36 +0100 Erwin Lam erwin...@dds.nl wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009 03:15:20 Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at
On Monday 23 November 2009 19:46:48 Scott Bennett wrote:
big snip ...
tor-0.2.1.20-1.pm.1.1.x86_64
Try 0.2.2.6-alpha. I'm running 0.2.2.5-alpha with no problems.
openssl-0.9.8k-3.5.3.x86_64
You should probably also update openssl to 0.9.8l before building tor.
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 05:21:41AM +0100, Erwin Lam wrote:
Indeed it will not. We have a fix in svn to make the 0.2.1.x and
0.2.2.x-alpha series both work correctly with OpenSSL 0.9.8l.
With any luck, we should get releases out before too long.
Well, I am running tor v 0.2.1.20,
On Thursday 12 November 2009 03:15:20 Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:59:21PM -0500, Andrew S. Lists wrote:
On 11/05/09 15:52, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:10:00PM -0500, Marcus Griep wrote:
Don't know if any one else has seen or taken a look at this.
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:47:36PM +0100, erwin...@dds.nl wrote 2.2K bytes in
60 lines about:
: Would you mind releasing that updated version a.s.a.p. Tor doesn't work
: here at all anymore
What errors do you see in the tor logs?
--
Andrew Lewman
The Tor Project
pgp 0x31B0974B
Website:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:47:36 +0100 Erwin Lam erwin...@dds.nl wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009 03:15:20 Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:59:21PM -0500, Andrew S. Lists wrote:
On 11/05/09 15:52, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:10:00PM -0500, Marcus
On Monday 23 November 2009 03:29:14 Scott Bennett wrote:
On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 23:47:36 +0100 Erwin Lam erwin...@dds.nl wrote:
On Thursday 12 November 2009 03:15:20 Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:59:21PM -0500, Andrew S. Lists wrote:
On 11/05/09 15:52, Nick Mathewson
On 11/05/09 15:52, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:10:00PM -0500, Marcus Griep wrote:
Don't know if any one else has seen or taken a look at this. I don't know if
this affects Tor, though I believe that we do use certificate renegotiation
in the protocol, and that is the entry
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:59:21PM -0500, Andrew S. Lists wrote:
On 11/05/09 15:52, Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:10:00PM -0500, Marcus Griep wrote:
Don't know if any one else has seen or taken a look at this. I don't know
if
this affects Tor, though I believe that we
Don't know if any one else has seen or taken a look at this. I don't know if
this affects Tor, though I believe that we do use certificate renegotiation
in the protocol, and that is the entry vector for this particular
vulnerability:
TLS Man-in-the-middle on renegotiation vulnerability made
wrote:
Don't know if any one else has seen or taken a look at this. I don't know
if this affects Tor, though I believe that we do use certificate
renegotiation in the protocol, and that is the entry vector for this
particular vulnerability:
TLS Man-in-the-middle on renegotiation vulnerability
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 02:10:00PM -0500, Marcus Griep wrote:
Don't know if any one else has seen or taken a look at this. I don't know if
this affects Tor, though I believe that we do use certificate renegotiation
in the protocol, and that is the entry vector for this particular
14 matches
Mail list logo
