Re: @Scott Bennett

2009-07-01 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:34:38 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers t...@planetcobalt.net wrote: On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:14:29 -0600 Jim McClanahan wrote: Ah, I see. It is the duplicate messages from you that were confusing me. Why

Re: @Scott Bennett

2009-07-01 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2009-07-01 Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:34:38 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: Just standard netiquette for followups to messages posted on mailing ^^^ What about it? Had you taken

Re: @Scott Bennett

2009-07-01 Thread Scott Bennett
On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:06:52 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers t...@planetcobalt.net wrote: On 2009-07-01 Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:34:38 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: Just standard netiquette for followups

Re: @Scott Bennett

2009-07-01 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2009-07-01 Scott Bennett wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:06:52 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2009-07-01 Scott Bennett wrote: Once again your presumption is mistaken. I had indeed read that gloriously opaque stretch of text, though it has been a while since I last suffered through

Re: @Scott Bennett

2009-07-01 Thread Nils Vogels
Ansgar, Scott, On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:27 PM, Ansgar Wiechers t...@planetcobalt.net wrote: On 2009-07-01 Scott Bennett wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2009 16:06:52 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers wrote: On 2009-07-01 Scott Bennett wrote: snip discussion about netiquette Guys, this is or-talk, in your

@Scott Bennett

2009-06-30 Thread Jim McClanahan
I was trying to email you and it bounced: Final-Recipient: rfc822; benn...@cs.niu.edu Original-Recipient: rfc822;benn...@cs.niu.edu Action: failed Status: 5.7.1 Remote-MTA: dns; mp.cs.niu.edu Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.7.1 benn...@cs.niu.edu... Access denied

@Scott Bennett

2009-06-30 Thread Jim McClanahan
Ah, I see. It is the duplicate messages from you that were confusing me. Why duplicate messages? As somebody else has pointed out recently, the fact that I can post on or-talk means I am subscribed to or-talk.

Re: @Scott Bennett

2009-06-30 Thread Scott Bennett
.) Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * ** * A well regulated and disciplined

Re: @Scott Bennett

2009-06-30 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:14:29 -0600 Jim McClanahan wrote: Ah, I see. It is the duplicate messages from you that were confusing me. Why duplicate messages? As somebody else has pointed out recently, the fact that I can post on or-talk means I am subscribed

Re: @Scott Bennett

2009-06-30 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:18:50 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers t...@planetcobalt.net On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:14:29 -0600 Jim McClanahan wrote: Ah, I see. It is the duplicate messages from you that were confusing me. Why duplicate messages? As somebody else has

Re: @Scott Bennett

2009-06-30 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:18:50 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers t...@planetcobalt.net On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:14:29 -0600 Jim McClanahan wrote: Ah, I see. It is the duplicate messages from you that were confusing me. Why duplicate

Re: @Scott Bennett

2009-06-30 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:33:38 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers t...@planetcobalt.net wrote: On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:18:50 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers t...@planetcobalt.net On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:14:29 -0600 Jim McClanahan wrote: Ah, I see

Re: @Scott Bennett

2009-06-30 Thread Ansgar Wiechers
On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On 2009-06-30 Scott Bennett wrote: On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 03:14:29 -0600 Jim McClanahan wrote: Ah, I see. It is the duplicate messages from you that were confusing me. Why duplicate messages? As somebody else has pointed out recently, the fact that I can