RE: parameter comparison

2001-11-08 Thread Reardon, Bruce (CALBBAY)
For those in v$resource_limit try the following query which I find useful: ---start here -- @resource_usage.sql -- -- 25-Aug-2000 Bruce Reardon -- -- Show the resource usage, including calculated percentage values -- 31-Aug-2001 , Bruce Reardon : Add in further order by relating to unlimited

Re: linux flavors + solaris for intel

2001-11-08 Thread Marin Dimitrov
- Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 19:50 1) i'm also thinking of installing an Intel Solaris on my PC . What would U vote for - linux or Intel Solaris ? depends on the $$$ u're willing to spend 2)

RE: blowing out rollbacks on select statements?

2001-11-08 Thread Baker, Barbara
It's like one of those silly kid games (when is a remote select like a two phase commit?) Seems pretty weird to me. But I tested it. It takes not only a TX lock, but a DX lock on the local RBS. I don't get why . . . RBS Name Used Blocks User Name Lo -- ---

Re: blowing out rollbacks on select statements?

2001-11-08 Thread Doug C
This note refers to the local rollback segment. The error is coming from the remote rollback segment. Also, despite 1 GB of rollback tablespace on that database, this error is occuring when there are only 2 4K blocks in use. Can anyone think of a scenario where a snapshot too old on the

RE: Application DBA vs. DBA vs. Application Administrator

2001-11-08 Thread DENNIS WILLIAMS
Patrice - I think the previous discussion was not referring to application developers that had appointed themselves to be an application DBA but to honest-to-goodness certified, card-carrying Oracle DBAs, some of whom tend to work with new development. I agree with you that DBA has the word

RE: Another Oracle DBA gets The Bullet in the UK - Seeking an O

2001-11-08 Thread Randy Kirkpatrick
RS That doesn't sound like good people skills ... just that you don't put up with any $ # ! ? ... Good people skills would leave them thinking their whimsies were entertained and you wouldn't call developers - duhvelopers (even if they are duhveloping with half a brain!) Randy Kirkpatrick

Re: Memory Windows for HP-UX

2001-11-08 Thread Ron Thomas
I believe any system running hpux 11.0 or above can utilize this functionality. See http://docs.hp.com/hpux/onlinedocs/os/memwn1_4.pdf I've been using it on our L2000 box. It was the only way to get 10 instances running at once. Ron Thomas Hypercom, Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: Memory Windows for HP-UX

2001-11-08 Thread Kimberly Smith
Do you do anything like dblinks in these 10 instances? I will have 4 instances which all have dblinks to each other in one way or another. From what I read I don't think its a problem but I am not really sure either. I also have no idea how MC ServiceGuard will come into play but I put that

RE: Memory Windows for HP-UX

2001-11-08 Thread Deshpande, Kirti
Kimberly, We are using memory windows on our N-class server supporting 21 instances (mainly development types). For 32-bit applications there is a max limit of 1.75 GB of shared memory resource for all applications combined. HP-UX 11.0 overcomes this with memory windows implementation. And it is

Raw partition Vs File System

2001-11-08 Thread Vasu Ramasamy
Hello Gurus, I am trying to install Oracle Server in the environment as given below. I am in the processes of laying out Physical Database layout. I would like to know the pros and cons of going with Raw partition. The environment : Solaris 2.6 Oracle 8.1.7

Re: blowing out rollbacks on select statements?

2001-11-08 Thread Scott Shafer
We get this all the time when running an ETL process over DB links. Too much DML on the source table at the time of the extract. No there isn't supposed to be any DML during the night, but I have remote users who think that... Oh, heck, they don't think at all! Scott Shafer San Antonio, TX

Re: blowing out rollbacks on select statements?

2001-11-08 Thread Jared . Still
Can anyone think of a scenario where a snapshot too old on the remote rollback would occur with so little rollback in use? Yes, if we're still talking about remote rollback here. As I recall from reading this earlier today, these are fairly lengthy queries that take awhile to run. If

Re: blowing out rollbacks on select statements?

2001-11-08 Thread Deepak Thapliyal
How about the delayed block cleanout effect where inactive entries in the rollback segment transaction header have been overwritten but the block header has not been cleaned and still shows the said transaction as active .. ora-1555 right? Deepak --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone

Re: HP-UX 11/8.1.6/Cache Buffers Chains

2001-11-08 Thread Deepak Thapliyal
try steve adams ixora.com --- Vergara, Michael (TEM) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Where can I find definitive information about the 'cache buffers chains' latch? The 'statsrep' report from Statspack shows this... Get Spin Latch Name

RE: Another Oracle DBA gets The Bullet in the UK - Seeking an O

2001-11-08 Thread Michael Kline
I remember we had procedures at the State. And what I would sometimes use was along the lines of: You realize that you have not followed the procedures, but you want to put it into production? I'm willing to do that, but first you'll need to sign a release that you accept responsibility for any

RE: Linux file locking question (semi-off topic)

2001-11-08 Thread Weaver, Walt
Alright, I sent out a totally innocent question to the list and didn't get a single suggestion. I'm very disappointed in you people. So, let me say that I figured it out without your help. And I ain't saying what I did. So there. PPPHHT!!! -- Walt (my RAM disk is working

Re: blowing out rollbacks on select statements?

2001-11-08 Thread Doug C
The problem I'm having is that I don't think it is being reused. It's only two blocks after all. That's no where near enough to cause a wrap.. is there some other situation? Someone was mentioning delayed block cleanout.. can this be a factor? These aren't long running queries particularly

re: java compiler error

2001-11-08 Thread Raymond Lee Meng Hong
Hei Guru , did you even encounther this error here is my simple dba.java. // Dba.java // SAVE THE FILE WITH THE SAME NAME AS THE PUBLIC CLASS import java.util.*; public class Dba {public static void printhello() { String prtString =Hello World ; System.out.println(prtString); } } I try to

Re: good workaround for a ORA-2016?

2001-11-08 Thread Doug C
That doesn't work.. same error. It doesn't like remote tables in the start with clause whether it's a view or not. On Thu, 08 Nov 2001 07:50:29 -0800, you wrote: If all the remote tables are on the same database and you have privileges to create a view on that remote database, then create a

V$PWFILE_USERS

2001-11-08 Thread Riswandi
Hi, Does anybody knows what the error below means or how te solve the problem? 007 select * from V$PWFILE_USERS;ERROR:ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KSSRMP1], [], [], [], [], [], [], [] no rows selected 007 SELECT * FROM SYS.V_$PWFILE_USERS;ERROR:ORA-00600: internal error

RE: V$PWFILE_USERS

2001-11-08 Thread Shreeni
This is well known/documented bug. See Metalink for details. Gues it was corrected 8.1.6 ??? Shreeni -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of RiswandiSent: Thursday, November 08, 2001 11:40 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list

RE: V$PWFILE_USERS

2001-11-08 Thread Tatireddy, Shrinivas (MED, Keane)
The v$pwfile_users generates an internal error if the client process fetched from it directly more than once. If only a single fetch is done that retrieves all the rows needed, then it works fine. An order by clause will allow the sort step to fetch all rows in a single call, and then it does

Re: Urgent Fail Safe Question

2001-11-08 Thread Jared Still
On Thursday 08 November 2001 11:20, you wrote: I just recently installed Oracle Fail Safe 3.1.2 on W2K, Oracle 8.1.7 for a ... It is for Windows only, because it ties into Microsoft Cluster Server. And it was very cool, we failed each node back and forth many times with no problems. Granted

Re: V$PWFILE_USERS

2001-11-08 Thread Riswandi
8.1.5 - Original Message - From: Shreeni To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:40 PM Subject: RE: V$PWFILE_USERS This is well known/documented bug. See Metalink for details. Gues it was corrected 8.1.6 ???

Re: V$PWFILE_USERS

2001-11-08 Thread Riswandi
Thank you very much - Original Message - From: Tatireddy, Shrinivas (MED, Keane) To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Sent: Friday, November 09, 2001 12:50 PM Subject: RE: V$PWFILE_USERS The v$pwfile_users generates an internal error if the client

RE: good workaround for a ORA-2016?

2001-11-08 Thread Jeffery Stevenson
...and you created the view on the other side of the database link where none of the tables are remote tables? Basically, on the remote system you would create a view like this: create view call_this_from_somewhere_else as select this and that from a table in this database start with primary