er to scan (read) the segment and find the
> > rows that need to be
> > updated. these rows get communicated back to the
> > master process using the
> > rowid. The master process starts to update rows
> > serially using the rowid for
> > update and this proce
--
> To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
> the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
> (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).
Listers,
Since there was some discussion about the next platform on which 9i might be
released, I thought some might be interested in knowing that 9i for HP-UX is
now available on TechNet.
Regards,
Larry G. Elkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.co
Listers,
I asked about this question a while back (9iAS 1.0.2 / Forms 6i Patch 2 /
Apache / connect mode = http / HP-UX 11.0). I thought I would give an update
since a few people showed interested in the subject.
They were seeing the Forms server crash numerous times a day in a test
environment.
Listers,
I might end up on a Data Warehouse and Data Mart project using 8i. I've read
various white papers, Oracle doc's, etc on partitioning capabilities of
8/8i. And I've dinked around on my test machine a bit trying things out. Are
there any books out there that you would recommend for digging
Jared,
Thanks for taking the time to reply. I don't know if they are working on any
contingency plans, but, I guess they could stay on OAS and Forms 5.0 if
things don't stabilize. I'm hoping that it is just a little configuration
issue here, a tweak there, and so on. We will see -- they don't pla
Jenny,
Just to make sure we are on the same page, when I was talking about web
deployed, I was talking strictly internal networks, lan, wan, etc using the
"web forms" approach.
Anyway, I don't know that you should nervous based on just my comments
alone. It is kind of interesting, though, that n
Helmut,
Oracle *can* "push" the criteria down into the view definition in many
situations. Certain operations, though, will not allow this to happen. You
can find some info on Metalink, and, in the Oracle 8i Designing and Tuning
for Performance manual. There are other source as well. Here is a li
Listers,
6i Forms Server in a test environment is crashing quite frequently, 3 to 4
times a day.
I'm relaying this question, and I'm not real familiar with the back end
configuration details, so I might be off on some things. They have an 8.1.7
test environment with 9iAS 1.0.2. Platform is HP-UX
Listers,
Users are desiring an org chart representation of data. Forms 6i Web
Deployed (9iAS 1.0.2, 8.1.7, HP-UX, Forms 6i Patch2).
One thought is to use a Java Bean since Forms 6i supports those. I have no
problem doing a google search and digging up a few Java Beans that say they
will do it, b
Listers,
Since I know there are folks on this list who also follow the LazyDBA list,
who is the list owner of LazyDBA? I'm thinking it is Henry something, but, I
can't remember the last name. I couldn't come up with any contact info at
the LazyDBA site.
I haven't been receiving emails from the L
Steve,
Thanks for the insight on how the kept status is managed during an
invalidation.
Regards,
Larry G. Elkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve Adams
>
> Hi Larry and list,
>
>
> When a library cache object i
Rafiq,
Thanks for taking the time to address this aspect. Those are the type of
details that help me in some of the areas I am trying to get my arms around
and better understand. I was aware of how the objects could become
invalidated, but, I didn't know it would be "re-pinned". It's something I
Thanks to all who replied.
An aging out mechanism for pinned packages didn't sound right. But, it seems
like there are exceptions to almost everything, and many times
contradictions, in Oracle docs. Just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing
something obvious, or obscure. The 2 DBA's in the meetin
Listers,
I was involved in a meeting today, strictly as a listener (no pun intended).
A consultant made the statement that pinned packages are subject to being
aged out of the shared pool, using an LRU type of mechanism. My
understanding is that if you pin a package, it stays pinned (except maybe
Mohammad,
http://technet.oracle.com/products/forms/
"Upgrade Developer Forms 4.5 to Oracle Forms 6" towards the bottom of the
page (or click the migration link towards the top of the page to take you
there.
Larry G. Elkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Eric,
Thanks for the feedback, and yes, the Intel boxes would be running NT. The
DB will still be on the HP V2500.
And where did you get the info on 8.1.7 and Forms Server not being able to
be on the same NT / W2K machine? I am about to try to install 9iAS on my W2K
box at home. I already have 8
Jared,
Even though it was easier to support (which can add up to cost savings) was
the performance a problem for you where on the Intel boxes?
Regards,
Larry G. Elkins
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Jared Still [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2001
Listers,
Currently running a Dev2k 2.1 web enabled application using 7.3.4 on an
HP-UX V2500 16 processor box with the Forms servers and OAS 3.x running on
5 HP-UX "D" class machines and the Reports Server running on the V2500.
Currently in the process of upgrading to 8.1.7, Developer 6i Release
Eriovaldo,
If you don't want to have to mess around with your SQL adding chr(10), and
since you said in SQL*Plus, you could use column commands:
SQL> column dname newline
SQL> column loc newline
1* select * from dept
SQL> /
10
ACCOUNTING
NEW YORK
20
RESEARCH
DALLAS
You can
Paul,
Thanks for the heads up. The application in question uses a lot of in-line
views, sometimes nested quite a few levels deep. On 7.3, they encountered
various aliasing problems -- needing to alias the column names in the
in-line views even if the name remained the same as the column name when
Diana,
Good to see you back on the list.
One of the DBA's has that book and will review it for applicable performance
related info. I was able to get a couple of examples from Technet where they
benchmarked a procedure using bulk binds against the same procedure not
using bulk binds. The same ty
Listers,
We will be upgrading from 7.3.4.3 to 8.1.7 (HP-UX 11.0 V2500). And this is a
bit of a broad question. Anyway, does anyone know of a paper, web site, etc
that goes through each of the features of 8.0 through 8.1.7 and provides
guidelines for estimating the potential performance return gai
Riyaj,
Thanks for responding. This is the first deadlock they have seen in 6 months
(they used to see a lot due to an application coding issue). So I agree with
waiting and seeing if this problem comes up again before putting a *lot* of
time or resources into it, but, I still needed to put *some*
Listers,
HP-UX 11.0, V7.3.4.3. Deadlock trace file snippet:
SELECT * FROM UNIT_STATISTICS WHERE UNIT_ID = :b1 AND MONTH = :b2 AND
YEAR = :b3 AND RANK_CODE = :b4 FOR UPDATE OF QUANTITY
Deadlock graph:
-Blocker(s) -Waiter(s)--
---
Resource
25 matches
Mail list logo