of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Analytic bug in 9.2.0.4
You are right Jared.
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kkqwrm_noref: COLFDNF set],
[], [], [], [], [],[], []
this is on oracle 9.2.0.3 Win2k+SP3.
Regards,
Jp.
-Original Message
Fixed in 10.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
The educated person is not the person
who can answer the questions, but the
person who can question the answers -- T. Schick Jr
One-day tutorials:
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/tutorial.html
Three-day seminar:
see
works on 9202 but that's not what you wanted to hear ... right?
Raj
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot
com All Views expressed in this email
are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod
can have facts, having
The
same thing occurs on OpenVMS on version 9.2.0.4 of Oracle.
Nelson
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003
7:29 PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject:
Analytic bug in 9.2.0.4While playing around
Do you know when will this fabulous version 10 be available for download?
On 12/05/2003 04:14:34 AM, Jonathan Lewis wrote:
Fixed in 10.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
The educated person is not the person
who can answer the questions, but the
person who
It wasnt fixed in my version of 9.2.0.3:
ERROR at line 11:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kkqwrm_noref: COLFDNF set], [],
[],
[], [], [], [], []
9.2.0.3, 32-bit. Solaris 8.
Brian
-
| Brian McGraw -+- Senior DBA |
| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
It works fine for me - 9.2.0.3, 64-bit, Solaris 9
-Debbie
-Original Message-
Brian McGraw
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:09 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
It wasn't fixed in my version of 9.2.0.3:
ERROR at line 11:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments:
]
cc:
Subject:RE: Analytic bug in 9.2.0.4
works on 9202 but that's not what you wanted to hear ... right?
Raj
Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com
All Views expressed in this email are strictly
-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:RE: Analytic bug in 9.2.0.4
It works fine for me - 9.2.0.3, 64-bit, Solaris 9
-Debbie
-Original Message-
Brian McGraw
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 8:09 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
It wasn't fixed in my version
Title: Message
Just
to add to the list
Tru64/Trucluster 5.1b - 9.2.0.4 rac
from
v$pga_target_advice_histogram *ERROR at line
11:ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kkqwrm_noref: COLFDNF set],
[], [],[], [], [], [], []
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
While playing around with SQL for some PGA scripts, I managed to create some SQL
that will consistently cause ORA-600 [kkqwrm_noref: COLFDNF set]
This appears to be Bug # 2507421, which was supposedly fixed in 9.2.0.3.
Here's the SQL:
select
pga_target_for_estimate
,
You are right Jared.
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kkqwrm_noref: COLFDNF set],
[], [], [], [], [],[], []
this is on oracle 9.2.0.3 Win2k+SP3.
Regards,
Jp.
-Original Message-
While playing around with SQL for some PGA scripts, I managed to create
some SQL
that will
Hi Listers
Any idea about
this Bug in 9.2.0.4.
If you try "select 'Hello' from dual order by 1 desc;" you may run
into the bug. It creates a dump in udump and could disconnect your session.
Oracle is creating a one-off patch to fix. The bug is for any order by
x, where x i
Munish,
i posted the same content to the LIST this morning.
i tried it on my instance and it happens :((
Jp.
22-09-2003 17:19:39, Munish Bajaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Listers
Any idea about this Bug in 9.2.0.4.
If you try select 'Hello' from dual order by 1 desc; you may run
:
Sent by: Subject: Bug in 9.2.0.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
city.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.co.jp cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: Bug in 9.2.0.4
[EMAIL PROTECTED
]
Subject: Re: Bug in 9.2.0.4(Document
link: ManojKrJha)
Can any body try the following in 9.2.0.4
SQL select object_name,object_type,owner from dba_objects where
ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Bug in 9.2.0.4
Hi Listers
Any idea about this Bug in 9.2.0.4.
If you try select 'Hello' from dual order by 1 desc; you may run into
the bug. It creates a dump in udump and could disconnect your session.
Oracle is creating
in
udump, but it does write to core.log in cdump.
regards
Jo
Munish Bajaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/22/2003 10:19
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Bug in 9.2.0.4
to core.log in cdump.
regards
Jo
Munish Bajaj [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/22/2003 10:19
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Bug in 9.2.0.4
Hi Listers
Any idea about
Ohhh ! ...i don't find 3110923 patch fix for Ms-Win :(
22-09-2003 20:39:52, Nigel Bishop [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ooops - Sorry Monday morning cut paste error - patch number should read 3110923
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author: Prem Khanna J
INET:
Hi all,
Got the info' below from www.dba-village.com and thought of sharing it with u guys.
If you try select 'Hello' from dual order by 1 desc; you may run into the bug.
It creates a dump
22 matches
Mail list logo
