To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: IBM AIX Shark storage?
I don't have any specifics but we were replacing all
of our older storage with Sharks. The plan was
developed a couple of years ago. As we get more
experience
James
We use Shark internally, connected to AIX, Solaris and Windows servers. Much
better than Hitachi IMO. The caching mechanism is similar to EMC, and the IO
performance is excellent, even with RAID5. Actually I am told it is RAID-S,
but it is all a black box to me. I just know that my DSS DW
)
Sent by: Subject: IBM AIX Shark storage?
[EMAIL PROTECTED
we are using Shark (prod) as well as Hitachi (development). Yes, Shark is
Raid 5, and so was our Hitachi. Shark is better. We haven't seen bad
performance hits, but we are not transactional, we are read only there.
SQL-Loader loads run the same regardless of shark or ssa though.
April Wells
