Check Note 190435.1 on MetaLink.
[It is under Upcoming Oracle Product Desupports].
At 09:41 AM 13-06-02 -0700, Charlie Mengler wrote:
I just went to Metalink viewed the desupport notices.
I did not see where any 9i version is listed.
Where did you find the notice for 9iR1?
Hemant K Chitale
: RE: Oracle 9.0.1.3 or 9.2.0?
We are toying with the idea of crafting a policy that we only upgrade
to a terminal release of a given version (e.g. 8.1.7, 9.0.1.3) in most
cases, unless a different version is required by a vendor. It seems
that these terminal release versions tend
Thats what Metalink has to say ( dunno what the note
id is)..Expect '10i' sometime next year I'd say. For
similar reasons, 8.1.7 is supported longer than 9.0
(since 9.2 is the terminal release)
hth
connor
--- Grabowy, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello? 9.2 is the terminal release for
I thought the original question was what is more
stable 9.0 or 9.2.
If that is the basis for your decission stick with
9.0.1.3 or better until 9.2 gets a couple dot releases
on it.
With all the problems we have had with 9.0.1.x, I have
not had one support person recommend we go to 9.2 to
solve
We are toying with the idea of crafting a policy that we only upgrade
to a terminal release of a given version (e.g. 8.1.7, 9.0.1.3) in most
cases, unless a different version is required by a vendor. It seems
that these terminal release versions tend to be the most stable. Anyone
else doing that?
We are currently planning to upgrade an 8.1.5 OPS
instance to 9i.
We had rejected the idea of upgrading to the first release
of 9i -- implementing a standing rule not to upgrade
to Release1 of any new version.
Therefore, we had always planned to wait for 9iRelease2.
Within two weeks of the
We started with 9011 then had bunch of patches for the bugs we discovered
for Oracle, then we went to 9012 and some problems (like temp blobs leak,
xml parts crash, smon leak etc) still persisted. But the application is
holding itself better than first version. Due to world cup we have delayed
Hi DBAs
We are upgrading from 8.1.5 to 9.x. I thought of finding out which release
of 9i is more stable. As We have got 9.2 couple of weeks back, I was just
wondering what is worth going for 9.2 instead of 9.0.1.3?
TIA,
Raj
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
I'd go 9.2 - its the terminal release so will
supported for longer and removes Oracle's standard
reply of 'please move to 9.2 and see if the problem
disappears'
hth
connor
--- Raj Gopalan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Hi DBAs
We are upgrading from 8.1.5 to 9.x. I thought of
finding out which
Hello? 9.2 is the terminal release for Oracle9? So Oracle10 is next, aside
from patches, etc. to 9?
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 1:33 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I'd go 9.2 - its the terminal release so will
supported for longer and removes
If you want stability I would stick w/9.0.1.3 (or .4
if it is available for your port).
--- Raj Gopalan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi DBAs
We are upgrading from 8.1.5 to 9.x. I thought of
finding out which release
of 9i is more stable. As We have got 9.2 couple of
weeks back, I was just
11 matches
Mail list logo
