I don't know if she has a web site, but this is one of her books:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0701168889/o/qid=992607058/sr=8
-1/202-3082814-8953423
I hear that her TV series will be coming on in the US soon. Her cooking
style is very compatible with my own, full-fat ingredients
Actually, this is a better URL:
http://www.amazon.co.uk/exec/obidos/ASIN/0701172878/o/qid=992607528/sr=8
-1/202-3082814-8953423
g.
-Original Message-
Sent: 13 June 2001 20:01
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Nigella I think I want to see this. And I know I want to know
Title: Question about LMT
Hi all,
I created a tablespace in LMT. I created all my datafiles with an extra 64 Kb for the bitmap index.
My question is : If I want to resize my datafile, do I have to keep this extra 64 Kb ?
Example : datafile size = 500M + 64 Kb = 512064 Kb
resize
Title: Question about LMT
Hi Luc,
If you try to resize a datafile to a size
below that of the actual data it contains, Oracle will warn you. Try setting
Autoextend on if you're worried about running out of space on a recently
shrunk file; looking at your numbers I'm guessing that you
Title: Question about LMT
Hi
Guy,
My
question is only for the extra 64 Kb. When we created datafiles, we added
64 Kb for the last extend (becausebitmap index need only 64
Kb).
Is it
important to keep this extra 64 Kb when we want to resize the
datafiles.
Luc
-Message
d'origine
Title: Question about LMT
Guy,
I think 64K makes a difference, depending on the size of the
uniform extent specified for LMT.
Let say, we create 100M file with 10M extent size and don't
add 64K to the size of the file. Then, the last 10M (minus 64K) in the file will
be wasted.
It does
Title: Question about LMT
Also
note, if you try resizing a datafile smaller than it has ever been, it will
complain.
In
other words, if you have a 500M datafile and used 400M, then drop 300M,you
cannot resize it to 100M.
"Walking on water and developing software from a
specific
Title: Question about LMT
Luc,
How are you calculating the size you want
to resize the datafiles to? If it
is based on how much they are actually used, then no. If it is based on
an external calculation of how much space you expect to use, then yes, but 64k
won't make much difference
Guy,
Welcome back, we've missed you (and especially your Friday recipes!)
Rachel
From: Guy Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Question about LMT
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 04:15:22 -0800
Hi Luc,
If you
Title: Question about LMT
Ah, got it, hadn't considered the
extent size.
Thanks,
g.
-Original
Message-
From: Igor Neyman
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 June 2001 15:36
To: Multiple recipients of list
ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: Question about LMT
Guy,
I
Hi Rachel,
I kinda got sidetracked into being a system analyst for a bit, but now I'm a
DBA again (at a different company). It's all coming back to me... then
Oracle decided to go and release a whole 'nother version, 9i.
I'll try to dig out a recipe for Friday. Incidentally, if anyone's
Title: Question about LMT
i
agree, I think the 64k is a mute point, at worse case you have one unusable
extent at the end when using LMT. But if your extents are 100M, it may be
a little issue.
"Walking on water and developing software from a
specification are easy if both are f
:07 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Question about LMT
Guy,
Welcome back, we've missed you (and especially your Friday recipes!)
Rachel
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Deshpande, Kirti
INET: [EMAIL
Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [OFF TOPIC] RE: Question about LMT
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:56:44 -0800
Hi Rachel,
I kinda got sidetracked into being a system analyst for a bit, but now I'm
a
DBA again
14 matches
Mail list logo
