2000 --> Windows XP Professional
>
> Windows95 --> Windows 98 --> WndowsME --> Windows XP
>
> As far as I know.
...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kimberly Smith [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 12:12 P
March 13, 2001 1:27 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: (Fwd) Re: (Fwd/Oracle) Does NT write to random
locations on d
Windows NT --> Windows2000 --> Windows XP Professional
Windows95 --> Windows 98 --> WndowsME --> Windo
Maritimes Region, DFO | Région des Maritimes, MPO
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Kimberly Smith [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 12:12 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-
Windows NT is being replaced by Windows 2000 not Windows XP.
Windows XP is replacing Windows 98. What you learn regarding
NT is still relevant for 2000 as it built on the same
technology.
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 4:35 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
o
Title: RE: (Fwd) Re: (Fwd/Oracle) Does NT write to random locations on d
Eric, you are a scholar and a gentleman, thanks
for your response. Thanks for the final clarifications.
I agree the tape/delete/rewrite scenario is extreme
as far as defragging, i've seen just great performanc
Title: RE: (Fwd) Re: (Fwd/Oracle) Does NT write to random locations on di
EP,
*excellent* post. Most useful! Thanks.
All I can add is that O&O Defrag does an
MFT defragmentation, too! (Isn't that cool?)
Ross
-Original Message-
From: Eric D. Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Se
Thanks Eric.
This is the kind of information I would have liked to see in the Mark Minasi
Mastering Windows NT book by Sybex, for example. We know where the dialog
boxes and the buttons are, why hasn't anyone published info on how to
configure NT properly.
Armed with that info, someone could th
FYI someone mentioned RAW volumes, I tested this last year. There was NO
performance improvement between NTFS and RAW, I suspect it's because this
little test "server" here has IDE drives and the controller is a bottleneck.
It seems RAW would reduce the likelihood of fragmentation, if it doesn'
--Original Message-From: Kevin Kostyszyn
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, March 12, 2001 4:56
PMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
(Fwd) Re: (Fwd/Oracle) Does NT write to random locations on
d
I
don't know Ross, I didn't want to dig to deep into i
On 12 Mar 2001, at 13:17, Mohan, Ross scribbled with alacrity and cogency:
Date sent: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:17:18 -0800
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I don't see the logic in the last post: "You can't have fast and best."
Dude,
t
ect: RE: (Fwd) Re: (Fwd/Oracle) Does NT write to random
locations on d
EP,
I don't see the logic in the last post: "You can't have fast
and best."
First, he doesn't define terms. "Fast"? Is that peak
I/O? Streaming I/O? Single block rea
Title: RE: (Fwd) Re: (Fwd/Oracle) Does NT write to random locations on di
EP,
I don't see the logic in the last post: "You can't have fast and best."
First, he doesn't define terms. "Fast"? Is that peak I/O? Streaming I/O?
Single block read? Seek time? Write time? Come on, trying to red
I have to agree with Ross on this one, O&O Defrag is "The Man" when it comes
to defrag tools for NT/2000. i think the site is more :
www.oosoft.de
and the link to the product:
http://www.oosoft.de/english/loader.html?/english/products/ood2000pro/ood200
0pro.html
(god I feel like Ep now:)
I've
Title: RE: (Fwd) RE: (Fwd/Oracle) Does NT write to random locations on di
IMHO, the disk toolsuite that is unbeatable is by O&O Defrag.
something like oodefrag.com
i have been using this to great effect for years.
and
they have some truly and really neat optimization utilities..
14 matches
Mail list logo
