LMAO
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 February 2002 21:53
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Talk about serendipity -- I hope you payed that disconnected contractor a
bonus for debugging your failsafe setup?
-Original Message-
Sent: Thursday,
Sounds like a poor HA cluster implementation. In our environment, all the disks are
in disk groups (which are known to all the hosts in the cluster). Only one host can
have the diskgroup imported at one time. That's just basic hardware clustering 101.
We also have EMC disk behind it all.
Stay with HP Serviceguard! From experience, I rank HA solutions in this order:
1. HP serviceguard - easy and it works.
2. IBM HACMP - do it the way IBM wants it and it works.
3. Sun Cluster - get a high paid consultant to set it up and have them come back to
change it :) Better yet, go with
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 06:00:04AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consequently we abandoned ServiceGuard are
going to standby databases instead.
Dick Goulet
I have been very pleased with standby stability, but find it a little
awkward wrt maintenance as availability demands increase. I
Actually, the heartbeat has been the biggest pain in the but of
ServiceGuard. Its caused 99.99% of the failures. Granted once
it was a failed network card. All in all though, I have been pretty
happy with ServiceGuard. And ours is dedicated and protected:-)
-Original Message-
[EMAIL
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 07:18:34AM -0800, Kimberly Smith wrote:
Actually, the heartbeat has been the biggest pain in the but of
ServiceGuard.
butt n. The larger or thicker end of an object: the butt of a rifle.
My associates tell me I am an expert in this area...
recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: MC/Serviceguard vs Sun Clusters
Stay with HP Serviceguard! From experience, I rank HA solutions in this
order:
1. HP serviceguard - easy and it works.
2. IBM HACMP - do it the way IBM wants it and it works.
3. Sun Cluster - get a high paid
Title: RE: MC/Serviceguard vs Sun Clusters
Were you only running a single heartbeat connection?
Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doing linear scans over an associative array is like
trying to club someone to death with a loaded Uzi.
- Larry Wall (creator of Perl
,
~Ruth
Beware of the lollipop of mediocrity.
One lick and you'll suck forever.
-Original Message-
From: Gene Sais [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 8:18 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject:Re: MC/Serviceguard vs Sun Clusters
Could you explain the file corruption in a little more detail? I cannot imagine how
failover would cause file corruption, much less how a properly configured running
Oracle instance can get 'absolutely destroyed'. Isn't that the purpose of having
Oracle over say a nonlogged, singlethreaded,
We have had file corruption before but never with Oracle. There
is a product we use here that uses a priority database that does
not do a two phase commit. When the disks fail over during the middle
of a write it causes a huge issues. It took the vendor a week
with a lot of our assistance to
11 matches
Mail list logo
