Re: ** materialized view fast not working

2003-10-28 Thread Mike Spalinger
Does the user have select access on the mlog? A Joshi wrote: Hi, I have a table tableA owned by userA. If I create a materialized view in another schema/user fast and complete refresh set to refresh every 10 minutes then only complete refresh works and refreshes automatically every 10

Re: ** materialized view fast not working

2003-10-28 Thread A Joshi
Mike : Yes the user has select access and is able to do a select on the MLOG table and the original table. Thanks for your help.Mike Spalinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does the user have select access on the mlog?A Joshi wrote: Hi, I have a table tableA owned by userA. If I create a materialized

Re: Materialized view and index

2003-10-27 Thread Arup Nanda
Chuan, You can crteate indexes on MVs if you want to - there is nothing against it; in fact it may be specifically desirable to do so. MVs are designed to help in query optimization by selecting against a materialized collection f data as opposed to selecting from a set of tables as in case of

Re: Materialized view and index

2003-10-27 Thread zhu chao
Creating Indexes on MV is pretty ok and it is good for performance. I even create mv on mv to further improve the performance of some really frequently executed SQL.:) Regards. Zhu Chao. - Original Message - To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,

RE: Materialized view

2003-06-26 Thread Stephen Lee
I'm not sure if you want to improve the query, or the replication process. If it's the replication process, one other option is 'refresh force'. Then, if I understand the docs correctly, you get a fast refresh if it can; and if refresh fast is not possible, then refresh complete. That's the

RE: Materialized view

2003-06-26 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: RE: Materialized view don't you need a 'count(*)' for refresh fast? Raj Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts

RE: Materialized view

2003-06-26 Thread Stephen Lee
For fast refresh, you need to have a snapshot log on the master table and the snapshot must be registered with the master. Keep in mind, we are only talking about simple, read-only, snapshots here. There are fancier ways of moving data here and there. But I would have to do the RTFM thing

RE: materialized view of a remote partition

2002-09-06 Thread Mandal, Ashoke
Hi Ray, Please let me know if you received any answer. Thanks, Ashoke -Original Message- Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 10:23 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L 8.1.7.4 create snapshot TEMP as select * from [EMAIL PROTECTED] partition (020904) ERROR at line 1:

Re: materialized view of a remote partition

2002-09-06 Thread Ray Stell
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 07:23:28AM -0800, Ray Stell wrote: 8.1.7.4 create snapshot TEMP as select * from [EMAIL PROTECTED] partition (020904) ERROR at line 1: ORA-14100: partition extended table name cannot refer to a remote object Well, it ain't pretty, but... on the remote db:

Re: Materialized view selection.

2002-08-19 Thread Maria Aurora VT de la Vega
Depends mostly on your users needs. If most of the time your users would want monthly sum of measures, you give them a materialized view for that. You can also use the summary advisor feature of oracle (dbms_olap) to find out which mviews oracle thinks is needed based on usage. =) Chuan Zhang

RE: Materialized View

2002-08-19 Thread Abdul Aleem
Title: RE: Simple question on logging.. Not sure but I think you need to have Enterprise Edition for that. Otherwise it should work fine Aleem -Original Message- From: Mandal, Ashoke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2002 5:18 AM To: Multiple recipients

Re: Materialized View

2002-04-24 Thread Bill Pass
I would start with checking what database links are vissible. Do a select * from all_db_links. A database link in the invoking schema should take precedence over a public one. Whatever link is being used, verify that you can connect to the remote database using it's connection symantics. You can

Attn. : Bill Pass (RE: Materialized View)

2002-04-24 Thread Atul Kumar
Hi Bill Thanks for your reply. In fact when I try following SQL i get result (few records available in table DEPT) select * from dept@softek1 I could not understand the meaning of your statement You can pull the clear text password out of sys.link$ for this puspose.. Please clarify and help.

RE: Materialized View over 2 tables

2001-10-30 Thread Rajesh Dayal
Title: Materialized View over 2 tables Thats not a problem. That is well-documented feature and you can check it with standard documents. Fast Refreshes are meant only for simple MVs/Snapshots and not for complex ones. You are supposed to do a complete refresh for complex ones.

RE: Materialized View over 2 tables

2001-10-30 Thread A. Bardeen
Helmut, Rajesh is absolutely correct. If one or more of the base tables are in a remote db then the fast refresh restrictions in the Replication manual apply; if all the base tables are local then the fast refresh restrictions in the Data Warehousing manual apply. A workaround would be to

Re: Materialized View/dbms_mview.refresh Question

2001-09-18 Thread mohammed bhatti
Just solved it...Duh! as sys grant alter any materialized view to User_B; --- mohammed bhatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a materialized view created by user A in schema A. The view consists of simple table joins and union statements. I want user B to be able to execute the refresh

RE: Materialized View Problem

2001-02-22 Thread Cale, Rick T (Richard)
Can you post the entire CREATE statement? Rick -Original Message- From: Terri Williamson/MIS/HQ/KEMET/US [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2001 9:26 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Materialized View Problem Hi All, I am trying