Re: RE: utl_file on Redhat Linux Oracle 9 standard engine

2003-07-11 Thread Jared Still
On Wednesday 09 July 2003 09:59, Matthew Zito wrote: Plus the syntax is much more flexible (read: lazier) than C, so it saves time. Interestingly enough, there are organizations that are starting to decide that the perl's syntactical flexibility is a negative - look at Yahoo's choice of PHP

Re: RE: utl_file on Redhat Linux Oracle 9 standard engine

2003-07-09 Thread rgaffuri
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: utl_file on Redhat Linux Oracle 9 standard engine John, UTL_FILE is one of the worst designed functions I've ever tried to use. In my opinion, it's a major design flaw to use the newline character ('\n') as a packet delimiter. If UTL_FILE gets input lines

RE: RE: utl_file on Redhat Linux Oracle 9 standard engine

2003-07-09 Thread Richard Ji
reasons? From: Cary Millsap [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/07/09 Wed AM 09:44:25 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: utl_file on Redhat Linux Oracle 9 standard engine John, UTL_FILE is one of the worst designed functions I've ever tried to use

RE: RE: utl_file on Redhat Linux Oracle 9 standard engine

2003-07-09 Thread Matthew Zito
] On Behalf Of Richard Ji Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:55 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: RE: utl_file on Redhat Linux Oracle 9 standard engine Simpler, portability Richard -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:04 AM To: Multiple recipients