C.S.Venkata Subramanian" scribbled with glittering
crayon :
I have been working with Oracle under HP, I find HP
server with high fault toulerence and reliable. If we
tune the OS and DB then we can get
maximum performance.
I can vouch for that . I have been working with HP for
more than 5
Hi man, thanks for the more info u gave.
--
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:02:10
Raj Sakthi wrote:
C.S.Venkata Subramanian" scribbled with glittering
crayon :
I have been working with Oracle under HP, I find HP
server with high fault toulerence and reliable. If we
tune the OS and DB then we can
HP at version 10 and better is yet another SYSVR4 system. From a users or
programmers point of view it is very generic. Service Guard is HP fault
tolerant solution where two boxes share disk and if one node fails the other
can take over. It is fairly complex and requires a good UNIX sysadmin.
So what's wrong with a good oxymoron once in a while?
Reply Separator
Author: "Steve Orr" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 3/21/2001 3:11 PM
"pure Unix"
Now there's an oxymoron if there ever was one! :-)
-Original Message-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Why should you use OPS if you are using ServiceGuard? We are not
here and I have not come up with a single reason to. If you have
some I should relook at it.
-Original Message-
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 8:17 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
I have been working with
HI..
can someone please tell me a 'bit more'
about HP does it follow the 'basic tenets' of UNIX
or is it a 'freak deviant' version of UNIX (like AIX!!!)..
For starters what is service guard please?
is it a cluster software? or RAID software to handle
disk boxes?
How 'different' is HP unix
I have no experience with the Sun cluster but I do have
experience with the HP ServiceGuard as its what we run
here. We have even had it fail. We do have a Sun server
here with a database on it and although I like the server
and have no complaints I am much happier with HP. There
are just
Check the numbers again, especially the software. Having done the same study 1.5 yrs
ago, HP was a little more expensive in the HW but much cheaper in SW. Reason being
Sun uses Veritas Trusted Cluster (expensive $100k) for HA and HP uses MCServiceguard.
I've worked 5 yrs w/ Sun and 1.5 yrs
You will get patches and new versions of software
sooner on Solaris than you will on HP.
Jared
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Alex Apostolopoulos wrote:
Hi,
we are currently in the process of evaluating a high availiability cluster
for our production database. The final two solutions are:
I have been working with Oracle under HP, I find HP server with high fault toulerence
and reliable. If we tune the OS and DB then we can get maximum performance. One word
of caution is that, if u use Mc Servicegaurd then u shud go for OPS. Which works for
only on RAW partitions.
10 matches
Mail list logo
