Re[2]: Union quries: INTERSECT, MINUS, etc

2003-07-25 Thread Jonathan Gennick
Friday, July 25, 2003, 6:39:35 AM, you wrote: RC not very slick but I used MINUS yesterday to find parents with no RC children so as to purge them Offhand, I'd think you could do this without using MINUS. Maybe I'm wrong. But assuming there is a non-MINUS solution, what led you to choose to

Re[2]: Union quries: INTERSECT, MINUS, etc

2003-07-25 Thread Jonathan Gennick
Friday, July 25, 2003, 6:39:35 AM, Rachel wrote: RC not very slick but I used MINUS yesterday to find parents with no RC children so as to purge them Rachel, you make me very glad I have two kids. Please don't purge me, ok? grin Best regards, Jonathan Gennick --- Brighten the corner where

Re: Re[2]: Union quries: INTERSECT, MINUS, etc

2003-07-25 Thread Rachel Carmichael
I'd purge myself first 'cause I don't have kids. Like the bad joke After I kill myself I'm turning the gun on you --- Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Friday, July 25, 2003, 6:39:35 AM, Rachel wrote: RC not very slick but I used MINUS yesterday to find parents with no RC children

Re: Re[2]: Union quries: INTERSECT, MINUS, etc

2003-07-25 Thread rgaffuri
where will you publish this? Id like to read your results. From: Jonathan Gennick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 2003/07/25 Fri AM 10:04:25 EDT To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re[2]: Union quries: INTERSECT, MINUS, etc Friday, July 25, 2003, 6:39:35 AM

Re: Re[2]: Union quries: INTERSECT, MINUS, etc

2003-07-25 Thread Rachel Carmichael
okay, I answered this offlist but... it started out as do we have a problem, indicated by records in the parent table with no children select id from parent minus select parentid from child that identified that we had a problem. next step (I'm a paranoid DBA when it comes to permanently

Re: Re[2]: Union quries: INTERSECT, MINUS, etc

2003-07-25 Thread Peter . McLarty
by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 26-07-2003 12:24 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject:Re: Re[2]: Union quries: INTERSECT, MINUS, etc okay, I answered this offlist but... it started out as do we have

Re[2]: Union quries: INTERSECT, MINUS, etc

2003-07-24 Thread Jonathan Gennick
Thursday, July 24, 2003, 10:09:25 AM, Dave wrote: DP Compared actual result set DP with expected result set via minus. I've done that too. I need to search the cobwebs of my memory a bit, but I recall having use MINUS both ways to be sure: results MINUS expected_results tells you whether the