Re: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-05 Thread Eric D. Pierce
To be clear: 9.0.x will *NOT* have any EAS (extended support) either after June 2003. Gruesome. regards, ep On 5 Jul 2002 at 1:18, Yechiel Adar wrote: Date sent: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 01:18:23 -0800 to 9.2? To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL

RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE!

2002-07-03 Thread Cherie_Machler
: co.uk Subject: RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE! Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE!

2002-07-03 Thread Simon . Anderson
Network Connor McDonald To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] hamcdc@yahoo. cc: co.uk Subject: RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE! Sent

RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE!

2002-07-03 Thread Simon . Anderson
Cutting and pasting from an old post: by Jonathan Lewis: The upshot of it seems to be that anyone who can get an sql session can look at any data, and given 'create view' as well can change data at will. You may be able to use the database in production, but only if your users can't access it

RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE!

2002-07-03 Thread Toepke, Kevin M
This is fixed in 9.0.1.3. I have verified it. -Original Message- Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 12:43 PM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Cutting and pasting from an old post: by Jonathan Lewis: The upshot of it seems to be that anyone who can get an sql session can look at

Re: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-03 Thread Alexandre Gorbatchev
by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? om 07/02/02 09:23 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L Cherie

RE: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-03 Thread Jesse, Rich
PROTECTED] Quad/Tech International, Sussex, WI USA -Original Message- From: Alexandre Gorbatchev [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:22 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? Yechiel

Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-02 Thread Cherie_Machler
We have a couple of new applications in development that are moving to QA. These databases are currently running 9.0.1.2 on Sun Solaris 2.6. We've been pretty happy with this version to this point but are at a pivotal spot in our product development cycle where we have a narrow window in which

Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-02 Thread dgoulet
Cherie, For the most part I don't like using version X.0 at any point. Now in version 8, I did get onto 8.0.5, but I did wait for the .5 to show up. With 8i it's 8.1.6 that was our baseline although I'm a lot happier with 8.1.7. For 9i I won't touch anything before 9.2, which is waiting

Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-02 Thread Cherie_Machler
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? om

Re: Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-02 Thread Alexandre Gorbatchev
Cherie, Before any upgrade I consider whether or no I really need it. For mission critical application it would be wise to stick with what you have, unless you have problems with it. Now we have 9.0.1.2 in production and 9.1.3 in development and I don't intend to move to 9.2 in nearest

Re[2]:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-02 Thread dgoulet
] om To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:Should we upgrade from

Re: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-02 Thread Yechiel Adar
by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? om 07/02/02 09:23 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L Cherie, For the most

Upgrade from 9.0.1.2

2002-07-02 Thread Harvinder Singh
Hi, We are currently testing our application on 9.0.1.2 and it looks stable except some bugs with function based indexes. Is it advisable to move to 9.0.1.3 (as it is terminal release of 9.0) or 9.2 which is just released 2 months back (and may have some bugs) OR 9.0.1.2 is stable enough

RE: Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-02 Thread MacGregor, Ian A.
The choice should be between 9.0.1.3 + patch 2121935 or 9.2. The patch is to fix a serious, serious security problem with ANSI-style joins.If you feel the need to go to 9i, I'd choose the latter. I don't think 9.2 has been out long enough. Ian MacGregor Stanford Linear Accelerator

RE: Re[2]:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-02 Thread Mercadante, Thomas F
by: cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re:Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2? om

RE: Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-02 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
I'd agree with Ian, because (at-least) on AIX, pre 9013 versions had smon leak, clob leak problems. Raj __ Rajendra Jamadagni MIS, ESPN Inc. Rajendra dot Jamadagni at ESPN dot com Any opinion expressed here is personal and doesn't

RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2

2002-07-02 Thread MacGregor, Ian A.
Did Oracle back port the patch to fix the ANSI-style jonn bug to 9.0.1.2? This bug allows one to read any table in the database despite the permission set. Ian MacGregor Stanford Linear Accelerator Center [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, July 02, 2002 8:23 AM To:

RE: Upgrade from 9.0.1.2 - NOPE!

2002-07-02 Thread Connor McDonald
I'm pretty sure this has not been done... NOBODY(!) should be on 9012 in production - unless you're happy with zero security. As well as the reading-anything as Ian points out, with a little bit of playing around its also possible to destroy any data in the database (since a view is updatable

Re: Should we upgrade from 9.0.1.2 to 9.2?

2002-07-02 Thread Michael Sale
Sigh, There are many answers to this question related to the environment you will be deploying into. It sounds like you are actually maintaining many databases. Are all of them really 24x7 (i.e. less than a minute of downtime per year) or can you schedule maintenance in the future that will not